Similar and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories

被引:140
作者
Markman, AB [1 ]
Wisniewski, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,EVANSTON,IL 60208
关键词
STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT; EVENT TAXONOMIES; COMPLEX CONCEPTS; SUPERORDINATE; OBJECTS; CHOICE; RECOGNITION; TYPICALITY; NAMES;
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.54
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Categories in the middle level of a taxonomic hierarchy tend to be highly differentiated in that they have both high levels of within-category similarity and low levels of between-category similarity. Research on similarity reveals a distinction between pairs of categories that are seen as dissimilar because they have few commonalities and pairs that are seen as dissimilar because they have many psychologically relevant alignable differences. The authors suggest that the low between-category similarity proposed for neighboring basic-level categories is actually a matter of having many psychologically relevant differences. In contrast, the low between-category similarity of superordinates is a result of their having few commonalities. The authors evaluate this claim in 4 experiments using a variety of natural stimuli and converging measures. The data support the importance of alignable differences for distinguishing between pairs of basic-level categories.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 70
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Anglin Jeremy M., 1977, Word, object and conceptual development
[2]  
BARSALOU LW, 1992, FRAMES, FIELDS, AND CONTRASTS, P21
[3]  
BATTIG WF, 1969, J EXPT PSYCHOL MON 2, V80
[4]   RECOGNITION-BY-COMPONENTS - A THEORY OF HUMAN IMAGE UNDERSTANDING [J].
BIEDERMAN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :115-147
[5]   HOW SHALL A THING BE CALLED [J].
BROWN, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1958, 65 (01) :14-21
[6]  
CANTOR N, 1979, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, P3
[7]   CREATION AND USE OF ENGLISH COMPOUND NOUNS [J].
DOWNING, P .
LANGUAGE, 1977, 53 (04) :810-842
[8]   THE MECHANISMS OF ANALOGICAL LEARNING [J].
GENTNER, D .
SIMILARITY AND ANALOGICAL REASONING, 1989, :199-241
[9]   STRUCTURE-MAPPING - A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALOGY [J].
GENTNER, D .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1983, 7 (02) :155-170
[10]   STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT IN COMPARISON - NO DIFFERENCE WITHOUT SIMILARITY [J].
GENTNER, D ;
MARKMAN, AB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (03) :152-158