Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: The role of impairment, prognosis, and pain

被引:69
作者
Coppola, KM
Bookwala, J
Ditto, PH
Lockhart, LK
Danks, JH
Smucker, WD
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Abington, PA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[4] Radford Univ, Radford, VA 24142 USA
[5] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[6] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/074811899200803
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatment are known to vary by type of medical condition and treatment. Less is known about how treatment preferences vary based on underlying health dimensions, such as the nature of the impairment prognostic information, and the experience of pain. Fifty elderly adults stated preferences for 4 life-sustaining treatments in response to 4 pairs of health state scenarios. Overall, life-sustaining treatments were preferred less in response to (a) cognitive versus physical impairment, (b) when the prognosis described no chance versus a very slight chance of recovery improvement, and (c) if pain was present. These findings have implications for the way in which preferences for life-sustaining treatments are recorded in advance directives. Historically, advance directives have been limited by overly broad or overly specific statements about treatment PI preferences. Recording underlying health dimensions that guide treatment decisions may allow decision makers to generalize and apply patient preferences to novel health conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 634
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM MED ASS, 1989, CURR OP COUNC JUD ET
[2]   CHOICES ABOUT CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN THE HOSPITAL - WHEN DO PHYSICIANS TALK WITH PATIENTS [J].
BEDELL, SE ;
DELBANCO, TL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (17) :1089-1093
[3]   DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS IN THE HOSPITAL - HOW ARE THEY USED AND WHAT IS THEIR IMPACT [J].
BEDELL, SE ;
PELLE, D ;
MAHER, PL ;
CLEARY, PD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (02) :233-237
[4]   ETHNICITY AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PATIENT AUTONOMY [J].
BLACKHALL, LJ ;
MURPHY, ST ;
FRANK, G ;
MICHEL, V ;
AZEN, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (10) :820-825
[5]   LIMITATIONS OF LISTING SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS IN ADVANCE DIRECTIVES [J].
BRETT, AS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (06) :825-828
[6]   FACTORS INFLUENCING HOSPITAL PATIENTS PREFERENCES IN THE UTILIZATION OF LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS [J].
COHENMANSFIELD, J ;
DROGE, JA ;
BILLIG, N .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1992, 32 (01) :89-95
[7]  
Ditto PH, 1996, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V15, P332, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.15.5.332
[8]   THE DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER - A COMPARISON OF PHYSICIAN AND PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION-MAKING [J].
EBELL, MH ;
DOUKAS, DJ ;
SMITH, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 (03) :255-260
[9]   THE MEDICAL DIRECTIVE - A NEW COMPREHENSIVE ADVANCE CARE DOCUMENT [J].
EMANUEL, LL ;
EMANUEL, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (22) :3288-3293
[10]   ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR MEDICAL-CARE - A CASE FOR GREATER USE [J].
EMANUEL, LL ;
BARRY, MJ ;
STOECKLE, JD ;
ETTELSON, LM ;
EMANUEL, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (13) :889-895