Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm confers an early survival benefit over open repair

被引:83
作者
Antoniou, George A. [1 ,2 ]
Georgiadis, George S. [2 ]
Antoniou, Stavros A. [3 ]
Pavlidis, Polyvios [1 ]
Maras, Dimitrios [1 ]
Sfyroeras, George S. [4 ]
Georgakarakos, Efstratios I. [2 ]
Lazarides, Miltos K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hellen Red Cross Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Athens, Greece
[2] Democritus Univ Thrace, Univ Hosp Alexandroupolis, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Alexandroupolis, Greece
[3] Univ Crete, Dept Surg, Univ Hosp Herakl, Iraklion, Greece
[4] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Vasc Surg, Attikon Univ Hosp, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; OPEN SURGERY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; IMPACT; EVAR; FEASIBILITY; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.109
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background: Despite the intuitive advantages of endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), uncertainty remains about the optimal management in the absence of convincing high-quality evidence. Our objective was to undertake a comprehensive literature review and perform a meta-analysis of outcome data of treatment modalities for ruptured AAAs. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted of electronic information sources to identify studies comparing perioperative outcomes of EVAR and open repair for AAA rupture. Summary estimates of odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with a random-effects model. Meta-regression models were formed to explore potential heterogeneity as a result of changes in practice over time. Results: We selected 41 studies for analysis. The entire meta-analysis population comprised 59,941 patients (8201 EVAR patients and 51,740 open repair patients). EVAR was associated with a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.50-0.64; P < .01; meta-analysis of risk-adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.73; P < .01). EVAR patients had a significantly decreased risk of developing respiratory complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.69; P < .01) and acute renal failure (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78; P < .01) and a trend toward a reduced incidence of cardiac complications (OR, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.00; P = .05) and mesenteric ischemia (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00; P = .05). Patients treated with EVAR had significantly less requirements of intraoperative blood transfusion (standardized mean difference, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.70; P < .01). Random-effects meta-regression revealed no statistical evidence for an association between death and year of publication (P = .19). Conclusions: Our analysis provides evidence to motivate the adoption of an EVAR-first policy in a nonelective setting and the establishment of standardized protocols for the management ruptured AAAs.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1105
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
Predictors for outcome after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Acosta, S. ;
Lindblad, B. ;
Zdanowski, Z. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 33 (03) :277-284
[2]
Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair [J].
Alsac, JM ;
Desgranges, P ;
Kobeiter, H ;
Becquemin, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 30 (06) :632-639
[3]
Early and mid-term results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era in a community hospital [J].
Anain, Paul M. ;
Anain, Joseph M. ;
Tiso, Michael ;
Nader, D. Nader ;
Dosluoglu, Hasan H. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 46 (05) :898-905
[4]
Antoniou GA, 2012, INT ANGIOL, V31, P303
[5]
A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Bown, MJ ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Bell, PRF ;
Sayers, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (06) :714-730
[6]
Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm:: Feasibility and impact on early outcome [J].
Brandt, M ;
Walluscheck, KP ;
Jahnke, T ;
Graw, K ;
Cremer, J ;
Müller-Hülsbeck, S .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (10) :1309-1312
[7]
Early Mortality Following Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms [J].
Chagpar, Ryaz B. ;
Harris, Jeremy R. ;
Lawlor, D. Kirk ;
DeRose, Guy ;
Forbes, Thomas L. .
VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 44 (08) :645-649
[8]
A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Coppi, Gioacchino ;
Silingardi, Roberto ;
Gennai, Stefano ;
Saitta, Giuseppe ;
Ciardullo, Anna Vittoria .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (06) :1140-1147
[9]
Endovascular techniques for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: 7-year intention-to-treat results [J].
Dalainas, Ilias ;
Nano, Giovanni ;
Bianchi, Paolo ;
Stegher, Silvia ;
Casana, Renato ;
Malacrida, Giovanni ;
Tealdi, Domenico G. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 30 (10) :1809-1816
[10]
Thirty-day NSQIP database outcomes of open versus endoluminal repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Davenport, Daniel L. ;
O'Keeffe, Shane D. ;
Minion, David J. ;
Sorial, Ehab E. ;
Endean, Eric D. ;
Xenos, Eleftherios S. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (02) :305-309