Microdrip irrigation of field crops: Effect on yield, water uptake, and drainage in sweet corn

被引:27
作者
Assouline, S [1 ]
Cohen, S [1 ]
Meerbach, D [1 ]
Harodi, T [1 ]
Rosner, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Soil Water & Environm Sci, Volcani Ctr, Dept Environm Phys & Irrigat, ARO, IL-50250 Bet Dagan, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2002.0228
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Microdrip irrigation supplies water at a rate close to that of plant water uptake. It is thus expected to improve yields and reduce water losses from drainage below the root zone. To test this assumption, four drip irrigation treatments were applied on corn (Zea mays L.) at Bet Dagan, Israel: (i) daily irrigation with 2 L h(-1) emitters (2-D); (ii) twice-weekly irrigation with 2 L h(-1) emitters (2-TW); (iii) weekly irrigation with 2 L h(-1) emitters (2-W); (iv) daily microdrip irrigation with 0.25 L h(-1) emitters (0.25-D). Total irrigation was similar for all treatments. Soil water content depth distribution was monitored by the neutron scattering method. Total water uptake (sap flow, SF) was measured using the heat pulse method for two consecutive periods of 2 wk. Relative drying of the 0.60- to 0.90-m soil layer was observed only in the microdrip treatment. These might indicate different root structure or water uptake patterns because of the low application rate. Highest estimated drainage fluxes were obtained for the 2-D treatment and lowest for the 0.25-D treatment, especially at the end of the growing period. The SF/ETp ratio was the steadiest for the 0.25-D treatment. The relationship of canopy conductance to vapor pressure difference for 0.25-D was not different from those of 2-D and 2-TW. Lower conductance values were obtained for 2-W at the end of the irrigation cycle. Daily irrigation led to the highest yield, while weekly irrigation led to the lowest. The results indicate that microdrip irrigation might improve yields and reduce water losses from drainage below the root zone.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Addiscott T. M., 1996, Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, V5, P1
[2]   MAIZE ROOT DEVELOPMENT UNDER VARIOUS LEVELS OF SALINITY AND WATER DISTRIBUTION [J].
ALKHAFAF, S ;
ALJANABI, K ;
HUSSAIN, IA ;
MANKY, FS ;
SALIEM, LH .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1989, 15 (04) :377-385
[3]  
[Anonymous], WATER IRRIG
[4]   A conceptual model of the soil water retention curve [J].
Assouline, S ;
Tessier, D ;
Bruand, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (02) :223-231
[5]   A model for soil relative hydraulic conductivity based on the water retention characteristic curve [J].
Assouline, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (02) :265-271
[6]   A conceptual model of the soil water retention curve (vol 34, pg 223, 1998) [J].
Assouline, S ;
Tessier, D ;
Bruand, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3769-3769
[7]   Simple microirrigation techniques for improving irrigation efficiency on vegetable gardens [J].
Batchelor, C ;
Lovell, C ;
Murata, M .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1996, 32 (01) :37-48
[8]  
BRESLER E, 1982, ADV SERIES AGR SCIK, V10
[9]   Root distribution and water uptake patterns of corn under surface and subsurface drip irrigation [J].
Coelho E.F. ;
Or D. .
Plant and Soil, 1999, 206 (2) :123-136
[10]  
Coelho FE, 1996, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V60, P1039, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040012x