Do Former Audit Firm Partners on Audit Committees Procure Greater Nonaudit Services from the Auditor?

被引:55
作者
Naiker, Vic [1 ]
Sharma, Divesh S. [2 ]
Sharma, Vineeta D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Kennesaw State Univ, Kennesaw, GA USA
关键词
alumni; audit committee; cooling-off period; former partner; independence; nonaudit; revolving-door; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; JOINT DETERMINATION; FEES; INDEPENDENCE; BOARD; EXPERTISE; OFFICERS; QUALITY; ALUMNI;
D O I
10.2308/accr-50271
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
To address potential threats to auditor independence, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requires the audit committee to pre-approve nonaudit services (NAS) procured from the auditor. However, the presence of a former audit firm partner (FAP) affiliated with the current auditor on the audit committee could undermine the audit committee's due diligence over the NAS pre-approval process. To alleviate such concerns, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved a three-year "cooling-off'' period for appointing audit firm alumni as independent directors. Our analyses show that the presence of both affiliated and unaffiliated FAPs on audit committees does not lead to greater NAS procured from the auditor; rather, FAPs reduce NAS procured from the auditor. Moreover, NAS decline significantly following the appointment of FAPs to the audit committee. Further tests suggest the three-year cooling-off period may not be warranted and deserves further investigation. Our study raises important implications for regulators, policy makers, corporate boards, and future research.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 326
页数:30
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit committees
    Abbott, LJ
    Parker, S
    Peters, GF
    Raghunandan, K
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2003, 20 (02) : 215 - 234
  • [2] Corporate governance and accounting scandals
    Agrawal, A
    Chadha, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2005, 48 (02) : 371 - 406
  • [3] [Anonymous], PAN AUD EFF REP REC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Canadian Accounting Perspectives
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Release No. 33-8183
  • [6] 34-47265
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, NASD and NYSE Rulemaking: Relating to Corporate Governance
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2007.03.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBP0L.2007.03.001]
  • [9] The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals
    Antle R.
    Gordon E.
    Narayanamoorthy G.
    Zhou L.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2006, 27 (3) : 235 - 266
  • [10] The Audit Committee Oversight Process
    Beasley, Mark S.
    Carcello, Joseph V.
    Hermanson, Dana R.
    Neal, Terry L.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 26 (01) : 65 - +