Aggregate Objective Functions and Pareto Frontiers: Required Relationships and Practical Implications

被引:67
作者
Messac, Achille [1 ]
Puemi-Sukam, Cyriaque [1 ]
Melachrinoudis, Emanuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Multidisciplinary Design & Optimizat Lab, Troy, NY 12190 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Multidisciplinary Design Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
physical programming; Pareto optimality; multiobjective optimization;
D O I
10.1023/A:1010035730904
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the problem of capturing Pareto optimal points on non-convex Pareto frontiers, which are encountered in nonlinear multiobjective optimization problems in computational engineering design optimization. The emphasis is on the choice of the aggregate objective function (AOF) of the objectives that is employed to capture Pareto optimal points. A fundamental property of the aggregate objective function, the admissibility property, is developed and its equivalence to the coordinatewise increasing property is established. Necessary and sufficient conditions for such an admissible aggregate objective function to capture Pareto optimal points are derived. Numerical examples illustrate these conditions in the biobjective case. This paper demonstrates in general terms the limitation of the popular weighted-sum AOF approach, which captures only convex Pareto frontiers, and helps us understand why some commonly used AOFs cannot capture desirable Pareto optimal points, and how to avoid this situation in practice. Since nearly all applications of optimization in engineering design involve the formation of AOFs, this paper is of direct theoretical and practical usefulness.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization [J].
Athan, TW ;
Papalambros, PY .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 27 (02) :155-176
[2]  
CHEN W, 1998, P DETC 98 ASME DES E
[3]  
COHON JL, 1978, MATH SCI ENG, V140
[4]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[5]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[6]  
Greenberg M., 1998, Advanced Engineering Mathematics
[7]   DEFECTIVENESS OF WEIGHTING METHOD IN MULTICRITERION OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURES [J].
KOSKI, J .
COMMUNICATIONS IN APPLIED NUMERICAL METHODS, 1985, 1 (06) :333-337
[8]  
MARLOW WH, 1978, MATH OPERATIONS RES
[9]  
*MATHW INC, 1984, MATL
[10]   Control-structure integrated design with closed-form design metrics using physical programming [J].
Messac, A .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (05) :855-864