Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy

被引:781
作者
Peeters, STH
Heemsbergen, WD
Koper, PCM
van Putten, WLJ
Slot, A
Dielwart, MFH
Bonfrer, JMG
Incrocci, L
Lebesque, AV
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Haga Hosp, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Radiotherapeut Inst Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[5] Zeeuws Radiotherapeut Inst, Vlissingen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2530
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine whether a dose of 78 Gy improves outcome compared with a conventional dose of 68 Gy for prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Patients and Methods Between June 1997 and February 2003, stage T1b-4 prostate cancer patients were enrolled onto a multicenter randomized trial Comparing 68 Gy with 78 Gy. Patients were stratified by institution, age, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), and treatment group. Four treatment groups (with specific radiation volumes) were defined based on the probability of seminal vesicle involvement. The primary end point was freedom from failure (FFF). Failure was defined as clinical failure or biochemical failure, according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology definition. Other end points were freedom from clinical failure (FFCF), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Median follow-up time was 51 months. Of the 669 enrolled patients, 664 were included in the analysis. HT was prescribed for 143 patients. FFF was significantly better in the 78-Gy arm compared with the 68-Gy arm (5-year FFF rate, 64% v 54%, respectively), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.74 (P=.02). No significant differences in FFCF or OS were seen between the treatment arms. There was no difference in late genitourinary toxicity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grade 2 or more and a slightly higher nonsignificant incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or more. Conclusion This multicenter randomized trial shows a significantly improved FFF in prostate cancer patients treated with a higher dose of radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1990 / 1996
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V319, P1681
  • [2] Dose escalation with 3D-CRT in prostate cancer: French study of dose escalation with conformal 3D radiotherapy in prostate cancer - Preliminary results
    Bey, P
    Carrie, C
    Beckendorf, V
    Ginestet, C
    Aletti, P
    Madelis, G
    Luporsi, E
    Pommier, P
    Cowen, D
    Gonzague-Casabianca, L
    Simonian-Sauve, M
    Maingon, P
    Naudy, S
    Lagrange, JL
    Marcie, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 513 - 517
  • [3] Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70-78 Gy) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms
    Boersma, LJ
    van den Brink, M
    Bruce, AM
    Shouman, T
    Gras, L
    te Velde, A
    Lebesque, JV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (01): : 83 - 92
  • [4] Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial
    Bolla, M
    Collette, L
    Blank, L
    Warde, P
    Dubois, JB
    Mirimanoff, RO
    Storme, G
    Bernier, J
    Kuten, A
    Sternberg, C
    Mattelaer, J
    Torecilla, JL
    Pfeffer, JR
    Cutajar, CL
    Zurlo, A
    Pierart, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) : 103 - 108
  • [5] Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation
    Bos, LJ
    Damen, EMF
    de Boer, RW
    Mijnheer, BJ
    McShan, DL
    Fraass, BA
    Kessler, ML
    Lebesque, JV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01): : 254 - 265
  • [6] Defining biochemical failure after radiotherapy with and without androgen deprivation for prostate cancer
    Buyyounouski, MK
    Hanlon, AL
    Eisenberg, DF
    Horwitz, EM
    Feigenberg, SJ
    Uzzo, RG
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (05): : 1455 - 1462
  • [7] A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy
    Chism, DB
    Hanlon, AL
    Horwitz, EM
    Feigenberg, SJ
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02): : 380 - 385
  • [8] Caution in interpreting biochemical control rates after treatment for prostate cancer: Length of follow-up influences results
    Connell, PP
    Ignacio, L
    McBride, RB
    Weichselbaum, RR
    Vijayakumar, S
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (05) : 875 - 879
  • [9] Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
  • [10] Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial
    Dearnaley, DP
    Khoo, VS
    Norman, AR
    Meyer, L
    Nahum, A
    Tait, D
    Yarnold, J
    Horwich, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9149) : 267 - 272