Antinuclear antibody testing - A study of clinical utility

被引:122
作者
Slater, CA
Davis, RB
Shmerling, RH
机构
[1] BETH ISRAEL HOSP, DIV RHEUMATOL, BOSTON, MA 02215 USA
[2] BETH ISRAEL HOSP, DIV GEN MED & PRIMARY CARE, BOSTON, MA 02215 USA
[3] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DIV RHEUMATOL, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[4] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.156.13.1421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the clinical utility of the antinuclear antibody (ANA) test as ordered in a large teaching hospital. Methods: Retrospective chart review in a 400-bed teaching hospital that provides care for hospital-based and community-based practices. Patients: A consecutive sample of 1010 patients (including inpatients and outpatients) for whom ANA testing was ordered over 10 months; all patients with positive ANA test results and an equal number of randomly selected patients with negative test results were included. Clinical utility of the ANA in the identification of rheumatic disease was determined by its estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: Of 1010 ANA test results reviewed, 153 were positive. The group with positive ANA test results included more patients aged 65 years or older than the group with negative ANA test results (30% vs 15%, P<.003). The diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was established in 17 patients, all of whom had positive ANA test results. Other rheumatic diseases were found in an additional 22 patients. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of the ANA test for SLE were 100% and 86%, respectively. For other rheumatic diseases, sensitivity and specificity were 42% and 85%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the ANA test was 11% for SLE and 11% for other rheumatic diseases. Specificity and positive predictive value for ANA testing in the elderly patients were lower than among younger patients. Conclusions: The sensitivity of the ANA test for SLE was high, but overall the positive predictive value was low for SLE or other rheumatic diseases. Sensitivity was low for ANA testing among patients with non-SLE rheumatic disease. More selective test ordering might improve the clinical utility of this test. Clinicians ordering the ANA test should be aware of the test's low-positive predictive value in settings with a low prevalence of rheumatic disease, particularly among older patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1425
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1966, DESIGN EXPT
[2]   NEWER LABORATORY PARAMETERS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF RHEUMATIC DISEASE [J].
CARSONS, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 85 (4A) :34-38
[3]   SELECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AND PROCEDURES - PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS [J].
GRINER, PF ;
MAYEWSKI, RJ ;
MUSHLIN, AI ;
GREENLAND, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 94 (04) :553-+
[4]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[5]  
HARGRAVES MM, 1948, P STAFF M MAYO CLIN, V23, P25
[6]   CASCADE TESTING FOR AUTOANTIBODIES IN CONNECTIVE-TISSUE DISEASES [J].
HOMBURGER, HA .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 70 (02) :183-184
[7]  
HOOPER B, 1972, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V12, P79
[8]  
JUBY AG, 1994, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V33, P1121
[9]   SCREENING STRATEGY FOR POPULATION STUDIES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - SERIES DESIGN [J].
LIANG, MH ;
MEENAN, RF ;
CATHCART, ES ;
SCHUR, PH .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1980, 23 (02) :153-157
[10]  
MANOUSSAKIS MN, 1987, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V69, P557