Influence of body roll on visually induced sensations of self-tilt and rotation

被引:21
作者
Groen, EL
Howard, IP
Cheung, BSK
机构
[1] TNO, Human Factors Res Inst, NL-3769 DE Soesterberg, Netherlands
[2] York Univ, Human Performance Lab, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[3] Def & Civil Inst Environm Med, N York, ON M3M 3B9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p2850
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Illusory self-tilt and illusory self-motion (vection) produced by rotation of a 360 degrees visual scene about the subject's roll axis was measured as a function of the presence or absence of actual rotation of the subject during acceleration of the visual scene. Rotation of the subject to a tilt of 15 degrees was at two levels of acceleration (onset) and with or without a delay between initial rotation and subsequent return (washout) to the vertical position. In one set of conditions, visual motion and subject motion were in opposite directions (concordant) and in another set they were in the, same direction (discordant). In two control conditions, the subject was rotated while the visual scene remained stationary. For concordant motion the main effect of body rotation was to reduce the time taken by the subject to indicate self-tilt as compared with the response time to visual motion alone. The magnitude of estimated self-tilt was increased by actual body tilt as could be expected from addition of the perceived actual body tilt and the illusory body tilt induced by visual rotation. This effect of augmented body tilt did not persist after the body was returned to the vertical. The magnitude of vection was not markedly influenced by body rotation and washout. For discordant motion of body and the visual scene, subjects were confused and their responses were very variable, suggesting a nonlinear visual-vestibular interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 297
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   STUDIES IN SPACE ORIENTATION .2. PERCEPTION OF THE UPRIGHT WITH DISPLACED VISUAL FIELDS AND WITH BODY TILTED [J].
ASCH, SE ;
WITKIN, HA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1948, 38 (04) :455-477
[2]  
BISHOF N, 1978, HDB SENSORY PHYSL, V6, P155
[3]  
BRANDT T, 1974, EXP BRAIN RES, V21, P337
[4]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLIGHT SIMULATOR MOTION AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS [J].
CARO, PW .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1979, 21 (04) :493-501
[5]   MOVING VISUAL SCENES INFLUENCE APPARENT DIRECTION OF GRAVITY [J].
DICHGANS, J ;
HELD, R ;
BRANDT, T ;
YOUNG, LR .
SCIENCE, 1972, 178 (4066) :1217-&
[6]  
Dichgans J, 1978, HDB SENSORY PHYSL, V8, P755, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-46354-9_25, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46354-9_25]
[7]  
GUNDRY AJ, 1978, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V49, P657
[8]   THRESHOLDS TO ROLL MOTION IN A FLIGHT SIMULATOR [J].
GUNDRY, AJ .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1977, 14 (07) :624-631
[9]   CHARACTERISTICS OF MOVING VISUAL SCENES INFLUENCING SPATIAL ORIENTATION [J].
HELD, R ;
DICHGANS, J ;
BAUER, J .
VISION RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (03) :357-&
[10]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF MOTION, THE VISUAL FRAME, AND VISUAL POLARITY TO SENSATIONS OF BODY TILT [J].
HOWARD, IP ;
CHILDERSON, L .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (07) :753-762