Self-described traits, values, and moods associated with individualism and collectivism - Testing I-C theory in an individualistic (US) and a collectivistic (Philippine) culture

被引:71
作者
Grimm, SD [1 ]
Church, AT [1 ]
Katigbak, MS [1 ]
Reyes, JAS [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0022022199030004005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors tested individualism-collectivism (I-C) theory by comparing self-described traits, values, and moods of students in individualistic (U.S., n = 660) and collectivistic (Philippine, n = 656) cultures and in students within these cultures varying in individualism and collectivism. They also examined the cross-cultural generalizability of factor dimensions derived with Hui's I-C measure. U.S. and Philippine students' self-descriptions of their personality traits, valued traits, general values, and moods generally differed in ways predicted by I-C theory. However, in comparing individualistic and collectivistic students within the two cultures, the U.S, results conformed more consistently to I-C theory than did the Philippine results. The cross-cultural comparability of the I-C factor dimensions was fair at best.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 500
页数:35
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHILIPPINE SOCIOLOGI
[2]  
[Anonymous], INDIVIDUALISM COLLEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 4 READINGS PHILIPPIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], CROSS CULTURAL RES M
[5]  
BENET V, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P701, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.69.6.701
[6]  
BIERBRAUER G, 1994, CROSS CULTURAL RES M, V18, P189
[7]   ETHNIC AFFIRMATION VERSUS CROSS-CULTURAL ACCOMMODATION - THE VARIABLE IMPACT OF QUESTIONNAIRE LANGUAGE ON CHINESE BILINGUALS FROM HONG-KONG [J].
BOND, MH ;
YANG, KS .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 13 (02) :169-185
[8]  
Bonifacio M.F., 1977, PHILIPPINE J PSYCHOL, V10, P29
[9]  
Brislin R., 1980, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, V2, P389
[10]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216