Value of static venous pressure for predicting arteriovenous graft thrombosis

被引:30
作者
Dember, LA
Holmberg, EF
Kaufman, JS
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Renal Sect, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
AV graft; thrombosis; stenosis; vascular access; hemodialysis; end-stage renal disease;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00337.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Static venous pressure elevation has been shown to have both high sensitivity and high specificity for hemodialysis arteriovenous (AV) graft venous anastomosis stenosis. However, it is not known how well static venous pressure elevation predicts subsequent AV graft thrombosis. Methods. Monthly static venous pressure measurements were made during two consecutive dialysis sessions in all patients with a functioning upper extremity AV graft in two hemodialysis units during a 16-month period. Static venous pressure was normalized to systolic blood pressure and corrected for the height difference between the AV graft and the dialysis machine pressure transducer to yield the static venous pressure ratio (SVPR). Results. Fifty-four patients (38%) had a thrombotic event during the study period and thus were labeled as clotters. Among the clotters, SVPR just prior to thrombosis was 0.51 +/- 0.16 (mean +/- SD), and mean time to thrombosis following an elevated SVPR (greater than or equal to0.4) was 118 +/- 106 days. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using the sensitivities and specificities of a range of SVPR values for access thrombosis within one, two, three and four months. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for the ROC curves ranged from 0.557 to 0.638, reflecting the absence of SVPR values with both high sensitivity and high specificity for access thrombosis. An increase in SVPR over time was not a better predictor of access thrombosis than absolute SVPR. Conclusion. Static venous pressure measurement is not an optimal screening test for identifying AV grafts at risk for thrombosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1899 / 1904
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V37, pS137, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0272-6386(01)70007-8
[2]   MECHANICAL VERSUS PHARMACOMECHANICAL THROMBOLYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF THROMBOSED DIALYSIS ACCESS GRAFTS [J].
BEATHARD, GA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 45 (05) :1401-1406
[3]  
Besarab A, 1998, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V9, P284
[4]   UTILITY OF INTRA-ACCESS PRESSURE MONITORING IN DETECTING AND CORRECTING VENOUS OUTLET STENOSES PRIOR TO THROMBOSIS [J].
BESARAB, A ;
SULLIVAN, KL ;
ROSS, RP ;
MORITZ, MJ .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 47 (05) :1364-1373
[5]   A comparison between PTFE and denatured homologous vein grafts for haemodialysis access: a prospective randomised multicentre trial [J].
Bosman, PJ ;
Blankestijn, PJ ;
van der Graaf, Y ;
Heintjes, RJ ;
Koomans, HA ;
Eikelboom, BC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 16 (02) :126-132
[6]  
FAN PY, 1992, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V3, P1
[7]  
Feldman HI, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P523
[8]   THEORY AND VALIDATION OF ACCESS FLOW MEASUREMENT BY DILUTION TECHNIQUE DURING HEMODIALYSIS [J].
KRIVITSKI, NM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 48 (01) :244-250
[9]   Predictive measures of vascular access thrombosis: A prospective study [J].
May, RE ;
Himmelfarb, J ;
Yenicesu, M ;
Knights, S ;
Ikizler, TA ;
Schulman, G ;
HernanzSchulman, M ;
Shyr, Y ;
Hakim, RM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 (06) :1656-1662
[10]   Clinical performance characteristics of hemodialysis graft monitoring [J].
McDougal, G ;
Agarwal, R .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 60 (02) :762-766