Extraterritorial Export Controls (Secondary Boycotts)

被引:22
作者
Ryngaert, Cedric [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Law, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Leuven Univ, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1093/chinesejil/jmn032
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Some States, the United States in particular, have given their export controls and economic boycotts extraterritorial application. As a result, persons and companies in other States have been prevented from exporting to or investing in the States that are actually the targets of the boycott. It is argued that extraterritorial export controls are unlawful under international law, unless they can be justified by accepted principles of jurisdiction (territoriality, national security, nationality), or if other States acquiesce. Permissive principles should not be construed too broadly, however: jurisdiction solely based on national control of foreign corporations does not seem to be lawful, nor does jurisdiction based on perceived but largely unsubstantiated security threats.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 658
页数:34
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
*ABA, 1998, AM BAR ASS ABA REC E
[2]  
ANDERSON J, 1996, RDAI, P1007
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, RCADI
[4]  
[Anonymous], HOUSTON J INT LAW
[5]  
BIANCHI, 1985, HARVARD LAW REV, V98, P1310
[6]  
BIANCHI, 1985, HARVARD LAW REV, V98, P1317
[7]  
Bianchi A, 1996, EXTRATERRITORIAL JUR, P74
[8]  
BIANCHI A, 1992, GYIL, V35, P394
[9]  
Bianchi Andrea, 1992, German Yearbook of International Law, V35, P366
[10]  
CAMPBELL K, 1997, HASTINGS ICLR, V20, P799