A comparison of epidural infusions in the combined spinal/epidural technique for labor analgesia

被引:12
作者
Beilin, Y
Nair, A
Arnold, I
Bernstein, HH
Zahn, J
Hossain, S
Bodian, CA
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biomath Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200204000-00029
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We compared the clinical effects of three epidural infusions initiated after subarachnoid medical ion was administered as part of the combined spinal/epidural technique for labor analgesia. Fifteen minutes after administering subarachnoid fentanyl 25 mug and 1 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, and 5 min after an epidural test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, women were randomized to receive an epidural infusion of saline, bupivacaine 0.125%, bupivacaine 0.0625%, or bupivacaine 0.04% with epinephrine 1:600,000. All epidural infusions were started at 10 mL/h, and all except the Saline Group also received fentanyl 2 mug/mL. The end point of the study was delivery or request for additional medication for analgesia. We found that time until request for additional analgesia was longest in women who received bupivacaine 0.125% (median duration, 300 min) versus saline (median duration, 118 min) (P = 0.0001) and was intermediate for bupivacaine 0.0625% and bupivacaine 0.04% (median duration, 162 and 180 min, respectively) (P = 0.0001 versus saline). Women who received bupivacaine 0.125% had the most motor block. We conclude that all the bupivacaine-based infusions we tested maintained the analgesia from subarachnoid medication longer than saline, with the longest duration, but the most motor block, from bupivacaine 0.125%.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 932
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   A NEW METHOD FOR MEASURING MOTOR BLOCK IN THE LOWER-EXTREMITIES [J].
AXELSSON, K ;
HALLGREN, S ;
WIDMAN, B ;
JOHANSSON, A ;
OLSTRIN, PO .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 29 (01) :72-78
[2]   The epidural test dose in obstetric patients: Has it outlived its usefulness? [J].
Birnbach, DJ ;
Chestnut, DH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (05) :971-972
[3]  
CHESTNUT DH, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P323
[4]   Comparison of midwife top-ups, continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintaining mobility after a low-dose combined spinal-epidural [J].
Collis, RE ;
Plaat, FS ;
Morgan, BM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :233-236
[5]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL AND STANDARD EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
COLLIS, RE ;
DAVIES, DWL ;
AVELING, W .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8962) :1413-1416
[6]   OPEN CHEST CARDIAC MASSAGE - A REVIEW [J].
ELDOR, J ;
FRANKEL, DZN ;
DAVIDSON, JT .
RESUSCITATION, 1988, 16 (03) :155-162
[7]   Effects of immediately initiating an epidural infusion in the combined spinal and epidural technique in nulliparous parturients [J].
Gaiser, RR ;
Lewin, SB ;
Cheek, TG ;
Gutsche, BB .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (03) :223-227
[8]   LIMITATIONS OF EPINEPHRINE AS A MARKER OF INTRAVASCULAR INJECTION IN LABORING WOMEN [J].
LEIGHTON, BL ;
NORRIS, MC ;
SOSIS, M ;
EPSTEIN, R ;
CHAYEN, B ;
LARIJANI, GE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (05) :688-691
[9]  
MacArthur C, 2001, LANCET, V358, P19
[10]   Labor epidural analgesia without an intravascular "test dose" [J].
Norris, MC ;
Fogel, ST ;
Dalman, H ;
Borrenpohl, S ;
Hoppe, W ;
Riley, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (06) :1495-1501