Chinese medicinal herbs for measles

被引:4
作者
Gu, R. [1 ]
Shi, Y. Y. [1 ]
Wu, T. X. [1 ]
Liu, G. J. [1 ]
Zhang, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Chinese Cochrane Ctr, W China Hosp, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2006年 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD005531.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Measles is an infectious disease caused by Morbillivirus. Chinese physicians believe that medicinal herbs are effective in alleviating symptoms and preventing complications. Chinese herbal medicines are dispensed according to the particular symptoms. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and possible adverse events of Chinese medicinal herbs in treating measles. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2005); EMBASE (1980 to June 2005); the Chinese Biomedical Database (1976 to June 2005); VIP Information (1989 to June 2005); China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (1994 to June 2005); and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials was searched for ongoing trials. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients with measles without complications were treated with Chinese medicinal herbs were included. Data collection and analysis The primary outcome measure was death from any cause. The secondary outcome measure was improvement of overall symptoms. The tertiary outcome measure was fever clearance time. Main results We identified 28 trials which claimed to use random allocation. Nineteen study authors were contacted by telephone and we discovered that the allocation methods they had used were not actually randomised. Three studies were excluded because the patients experienced complications. We were unable to contact the remaining six authors. These require further assessment and have been allocated to the 'Studies awaiting assessment' section. Authors' conclusions Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We interviewed by telephone the study authors for missing information regarding random allocation of the study process. Some trials allocated the participants according to the sequence they were admitted to the trials, that is to say, by using a pseudo-random allocation method. None of the trials concealed the allocation or blinding method. We hope future randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this field will be conducted.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
AI ZH, 2004, J BEIJING U TRADITIO, V11, P30
[2]
Alderson P, 2004, COCHRANE LIB
[3]
Budd C, 2002, PAEDIATRICS, P85
[4]
CAI JH, 2004, J GUANGDONG MED COLL, V22, P548
[5]
Cheng LS, 2002, J NURSING SCI, V17, P673
[6]
Cui JH, 1999, J LINYI MED COLL, V21, P115
[7]
CUI W, 1994, SHANXI J TRADITIONAL, V15, P345
[8]
DENG W, 2004, MODERN PHARM CLIN CH, P732
[9]
DU X, 2004, MODERN PHARM CLIN CH, P1506
[10]
FENG ZY, 1994, CENTRAL CHINA MED J, V18, P15