The validity and reliability of relative body fat estimates and the construction of new prediction equations for young Japanese adult males

被引:23
作者
Demura, S
Yamaji, S [2 ]
Goshi, F
Kobayashi, H
Sato, S
Nagasawa, Y
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Fac Educ, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9201192, Japan
[2] Fukui Natl Coll Technol, Fukui 9168507, Japan
[3] Miyagi Gakuin Womens Jr Coll, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9818557, Japan
[4] Kanazawa Inst Technol, Nonoichi, Ishikawa 9218501, Japan
[5] Akita Prefectural Coll Agr, Akita 010444, Japan
关键词
bioelectrical impedance analysis; relative body fat; reliability; skinfolds; underwater weighing; validity;
D O I
10.1080/026404102317200864
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to assess the reliability and validity of three methods of bioelectrical impedance analysis (based on induction between the hand and foot, between one foot and the other foot and between one hand and the other hand) and the skinfold method, and to construct prediction equations for total body density by examining cross-validity in young Japanese adult males. The participants were 50 Japanese males aged 18-27 years (height 1.72 +/- 0.06 m, body mass 64.9 +/- 9.0 kg; mean +/- s), each of whom was measured twice using each of the four methods. Relative body fat based on underwater weighing was used as the criterion for validity. To construct prediction equations for body density, we used multiple regression analysis, whereby all possible combinations were examined. The reliability of all three bioelectrical impedance methods was high (R = 0.999). Three new prediction equations were constructed for the hand-foot method, foot-foot method and skinfold method. The cross-validity of the equations was guaranteed. The relative body fat calculated using the new equations did not differ from that based on the underwater weighing method.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Assessment of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis for the prediction of total body water [J].
Bell, NA ;
McClure, PD ;
Hill, RJ ;
Davies, PSW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1998, 52 (11) :856-859
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Segmental body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and DEXA in humans [J].
Bracco, D ;
Thiebaud, D ;
Chiolero, RL ;
Landry, M ;
Burckhardt, P ;
Schutz, Y .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 81 (06) :2580-2587
[4]   TECHNIQUES OF MEASUREMENT OF BODY-COMPOSITION .1. [J].
BRODIE, DA .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1988, 5 (01) :11-40
[5]   DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
BROZEK, J ;
ANDERSON, JT ;
KEYS, A ;
GRANDE, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) :113-&
[6]  
Demura S, 2001, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V41, P114
[7]  
DEMURA S, 1999, J PHYSL ANTHR APPL H, V18, P43
[8]  
DEMURA S, IN PRESS J SPORTS ME
[9]  
Demura Shinichi, 2001, Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, V20, P29, DOI 10.2114/jpa.20.29
[10]  
FULLER NJ, 1989, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V43, P779