Four-month-olds' recognition of complementary-contour forms

被引:27
作者
Colombo, J
Frick, JE
Ryther, JS
Gifford, JJ
机构
[1] Department of Human Development, 4001 Dole Human Development Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pattern perception; complementary contours; habituation; object recognition; form recognition; visual attention;
D O I
10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90049-1
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Four-month-old long- and short-looking infants were habituated to a visual form from which 50% of the contour was removed. Infants were then tested for recognition of the visual form with paired comparison trials in which two other 50%-degraded visual forms were simultaneously presented. One of the two degraded forms presented in the test trials was a novel form, and the other form was comprised of the ''complementary contour'' (i.e., the contour not previously shown) of the degraded habituation stimulus. Thus, the task involved a test of infants' recognition of a form across stimuli that shared no common contour. Only infants with attentional profiles characterized by shorter fixation durations recognized forms when tested in this way. These results suggest that some infants are in fact capable of generalizing from one complementary image to another; the observation of this ability in only short-looking infants is consistent with previous suggestions of differences in visual encoding as a function of individual differences in fixation duration.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PRIMING CONTOUR-DELETED IMAGES - EVIDENCE FOR INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS IN VISUAL OBJECT RECOGNITION [J].
BIEDERMAN, I ;
COOPER, EE .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 23 (03) :393-419
[2]   RECOGNITION-BY-COMPONENTS - A THEORY OF HUMAN IMAGE UNDERSTANDING [J].
BIEDERMAN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :115-147
[3]  
BLICKLE TW, 1989, THESIS STATE U NEW Y
[4]   INFANT HABITUATION - ASSESSMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND SHORT-TERM RELIABILITY AT 5 MONTHS [J].
BORNSTEIN, MH ;
BENASICH, AA .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1986, 57 (01) :87-99
[5]  
Bronson G. W., 1982, SCANNING PATTERNS HU
[6]  
BRONSON GW, 1991, CHILD DEV, V62, P44, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01513.x
[7]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN INFANT VISUAL-ATTENTION - ARE SHORT LOOKERS FASTER PROCESSORS OR FEATURE PROCESSORS [J].
COLOMBO, J ;
MITCHELL, DW ;
COLDREN, JT ;
FREESEMAN, LJ .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 62 (06) :1247-1257
[8]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN INFANT FIXATION DURATION - DOMINANCE OF GLOBAL VERSUS LOCAL STIMULUS PROPERTIES [J].
COLOMBO, J ;
FREESEMAN, LJ ;
COLDREN, JT ;
FRICK, JE .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 10 (02) :271-285
[9]   A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE INFANT CONTROL PROCEDURE [J].
COLOMBO, J ;
HOROWITZ, FD .
INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 1985, 8 (01) :117-121
[10]   ON THE NEURAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING DEVELOPMENTAL AND INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN VISUAL FIXATION IN INFANCY - 2 HYPOTHESES [J].
COLOMBO, J .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1995, 15 (02) :97-135