Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum - What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists

被引:228
作者
Grumbach, K
Selby, JV
Damberg, C
Bindman, AB
Quesenberry, C
Truman, A
Uratsu, C
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Primary Care Res Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Calif Hlth Workforce Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Med Care Program No Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[6] Pacific Business Grp Hlth, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 282卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.282.3.261
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Few data are available regarding how patients view the role of primary care physicians as "gatekeepers" in managed care systems. Objective To determine the extent to which patients value the role of their primary care physicians as first-contact care providers and coordinators of referrals, whether patients perceive that their primary care physicians impede access to specialists, and whether problems in gaining access to specialists are associated with a reduction in patients' trust and confidence in their primary care physicians. Design, Setting, and Patients Cross-sectional survey mailed in the fall of 1997 to 12 707 adult patients who were members of managed care plans and received care from 10 large physician groups in California. The response rate among eligible patients was 71%. A total of 7718 patients (mean age, 66.7 years; 32% female) were eligible for analysis. Main Outcome Measures Questionnaire items addressed 3 main topics: (1) patient attitudes toward the first-contact and coordinating role of their primary care physicians, (2) patients' ratings of their primary care physicians (trust and confidence in and satisfaction with), and (3) patient perceptions of barriers to specialty referrals. Referral barriers were analyzed as predictors of patients' ratings of their physicians. Results Almost all patients valued the role of a primary care physician as a source of first-contact care (94%) and coordinator of referrals (89%). Depending on the specific medical problem, 75% to 91% of patients preferred to seek care initially from their primary care physicians rather than specialists. Twenty-three percent reported that their primary care physicians or medical groups interfered with their ability to see specialists. Patients who had difficulty obtaining referrals were more likely to report low trust (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.5), low confidence (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-2.9), and low satisfaction (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.6-4.2) with their primary care physicians. Conclusions Patients value the first-contact and coordinating role of primary care physicians. However, managed care policies that emphasize primary care physicians as gatekeepers impeding access to specialists undermine patients' trust and confidence in their primary care physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 266
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRUST IN PHYSICIAN SCALE - A MEASURE TO ASSESS INTERPERSONAL-TRUST IN PATIENT-PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS
    ANDERSON, LA
    DEDRICK, RF
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1990, 67 (03) : 1091 - 1100
  • [2] Primary care and receipt of preventive services
    Bindman, AB
    Grumbach, K
    Osmond, D
    Vranizan, K
    Stewart, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (05) : 269 - 276
  • [3] Understanding the managed care backlash
    Blendon, RJ
    Brodie, M
    Benson, JM
    Altman, DE
    Levitt, L
    Hoff, T
    Hugick, L
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (04) : 80 - 94
  • [4] Primary care physicians should be coordinators, not gatekeepers
    Bodenheimer, T
    Lo, B
    Casalino, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (21): : 2045 - 2049
  • [5] The HMO backlash - Righteous or reactionary?
    Bodenheimer, T
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (21) : 1601 - 1604
  • [6] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [7] Donaldson MS, 1996, Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era
  • [8] ELLSBURY KE, 1989, J FAM PRACTICE, V28, P698
  • [9] ELLSBURY KE, 1987, J FAM PRACTICE, V25, P616
  • [10] Flocke SA, 1997, J FAM PRACTICE, V45, P64