Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions

被引:191
作者
Scaperrotta, Gianfranco [1 ]
Ferranti, Claudio [1 ]
Costa, Claudia [1 ]
Mariani, Luigi [2 ]
Marchesini, Monica [1 ]
Suman, Laura [1 ]
Folini, Cristina [1 ]
Bergonzi, Silvana [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Dept Breast Imaging, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Unit Med Stat & Biometry, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Sonoelastography; Breast ultrasound; Non-palpable breast lesions;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1032-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of sonoelastography in differentiating benign from malignant non-palpable breast lesions. A total of 293 BI-RADS 3-5 (Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System) impalpable breast lesions in 278 women was evaluated with B-mode ultrasound (US) and subsequently with sonoelastography (SE) before performing US-guided biopsy. Among the 293 lesions (size up to 2 cm), 110 (37.5%) were histologically malignant and 183 (62.5%) benign. Lesions that were malignant or showed atypical ductal hyperplasia were referred for surgical excision, as well as 32 benign lesions showing discordance between US/SE results and histology. All other benign lesions had US follow-up at 6/12 months, showing stability. Overall performance of SE was lower than US, with sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 80.9%, respectively, for SE as compared with 95.4% and 87.4% for US. Statistical analysis showed no improvement in the joint use of SE and US over the use of US alone, whose performance, however, was very high in our study. SE is a simple, fast and non-invasive diagnostic method that may be a useful aid to US for less experienced radiologists in the assessment of solid non-palpable breast lesions, especially BI-RADS 3, where specificity was higher (88.7%).
引用
收藏
页码:2381 / 2389
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]
Comparison of various imaging methods with particular evaluation of Color Doppler sonography for planning surgery for breast tumors [J].
Blohmer, JU ;
Oellinger, H ;
Schmidt, C ;
Hufnagl, P ;
Felix, R ;
Lichtenegger, W .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1999, 262 (3-4) :159-171
[3]
Elastography of breast lesions: Initial clinical results [J].
Garra, BS ;
Cespedes, EI ;
Ophir, J ;
Spratt, SR ;
Zuurbier, RA ;
Magnant, CM ;
Pennanen, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) :79-86
[4]
Giuseppetti GM, 2005, RADIOL MED, V110, P69
[5]
A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[6]
THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[7]
Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions:: Clinical results [J].
Hiltawsky, KM ;
Krüger, M ;
Starke, C ;
Heuser, L ;
Ermert, H ;
Jensen, A .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 27 (11) :1461-1469
[8]
HUGHES LE, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1316, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91204-9
[9]
Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis [J].
Itoh, A ;
Ueno, E ;
Tohno, E ;
Kamma, H ;
Takahashi, H ;
Shiina, T ;
Yamakawa, M ;
Matsumura, T .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) :341-350
[10]
Quo vadis elasticity imaging? [J].
Konofagou, EE .
ULTRASONICS, 2004, 42 (1-9) :331-336