Techniques for chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a survey of practice in specialist UK centres

被引:13
作者
Carlin, A. J. [1 ]
Alfirevic, Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Womens Hosp, Div Perinatal & Reprod Med, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
prenatal diagnosis; chorionic villus sampling; amniocentesis; foetal ultrasound; general cytogenetics; maternal serum screening;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2060
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objectives Guidelines exist for amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS) practice, but there is no consensus regarding individual techniques. Our survey sought to review current practice within specialist centres in the United Kingdom. Methods RCOG sub-specialist training centres were invited to complete a postal questionnaire, seeking their consultants' primary choices for amniocentesis and CVS techniques. Information sought included needle choice, local anaesthetic (LA), suction methods, quantity of samples obtained: and with regard to CVS. preferred approach [transcervical (TC) or transabdominal (TA)]. Results Response rate was 96% providing information on III consultants (III amniocentesis/90 CVS). During amniocentesis, 86% use 22G needles and 70% are helped by an assistant who aspirates a set liquor volume (69%). For CVS, 98% use a TA approach, 89% use LA, and 29% an 18G single needle with 38% preferring a 17/19G double needle but no clear consensus regarding the use of assistants. Conclusions There is some agreement among specialists in the United Kingdom regarding techniques for invasive prenatal diagnosis. For amniocentesis, most operators use 22G needles, with an assistant to aspirate a set volume of fluid regardless of gestations. For CVS, there is considerable variation in needle choice, although most operators use a TA approach with LA. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 919
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Alfirevic Z, 2005, AMNIOCENTESIS CHORIO
[2]  
Alfirevic Z, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003252, 10.1002/14651858, 10.1002/14651858.CD003252]
[3]  
Alfirevic Z, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000114, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000114]
[4]   PROCEDURE-RELATED FETAL LOSSES IN TRANSPLACENTAL VERSUS NONTRANSPLACENTAL GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS [J].
BOMBARD, AT ;
POWERS, JF ;
CARTER, S ;
SCHWARTZ, A ;
NITOWSKY, HM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (03) :868-872
[5]   Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss [J].
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Hopkins, Linda M. ;
Norton, Mary E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) :612-616
[6]   ANALYSIS OF LIMB REDUCTION DEFECTS IN BABIES EXPOSED TO CHRONIC VILLUS SAMPLING [J].
FIRTH, HV ;
BOYD, P ;
CHAMBERLAIN, P ;
MACKENZIE, I ;
MORRISSKAY, GM ;
HUSON, SM .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8905) :1069-1071
[7]   SEVERE LIMB ABNORMALITIES AFTER CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING AT 56-66 DAYS GESTATION [J].
FIRTH, HV ;
BOYD, PA ;
CHAMBERLAIN, P ;
MACKENZIE, IZ ;
LINDENBAUM, RH ;
HUSON, SM .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8744) :762-763
[8]   TRANSPLACENTAL AMNIOCENTESIS - IS IT REALLY A HIGHER-RISK PROCEDURE [J].
GIORLANDINO, C ;
MOBILI, L ;
BILANCIONI, E ;
DALESSIO, P ;
CARCIOPPOLO, O ;
GENTILI, P ;
VIZZONE, A .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 14 (09) :803-806
[9]   Is the angle of needle insertion influencing the created defect in human fetal membranes?: Evaluation of the agreement between specialists' opinions and ex vivo observations [J].
Gratacós, E ;
Devlieger, R ;
Decaluwé, H ;
Wu, J ;
Nicolini, U ;
Deprest, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (03) :646-649
[10]   Monitoring obstetricians' performance with statistical process control charts [J].
Lane, S. ;
Weeks, A. ;
Scholefield, H. ;
Alfirevic, Z. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (05) :614-618