On the probabilistic failure assessment diagram

被引:6
作者
Wang, WQ [1 ]
Liu, CJ [1 ]
Zhou, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
关键词
structure reliability analysis; probabilistic assessment; failure assessment diagram; probabilistic failure assessment diagram;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-0161(99)00030-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Reliability analysis of structures containing defects carried out directly by practising engineers is quite complex and costly. Therefore, a simple and convenient reliability analysis method should be investigated and established. in this paper, the principle and building procedure of a reliability analysis method are described and the feasibility of the method are also explicitly clarified. Based on the assumptions that: (1) the load is a deterministic variable; (2) the yield strength and fracture toughness satisfy normal distribution and their variational coefficients are constant; (3) the initial crack length remains unchangeable, a set of probabilistic failure assessment diagrams (PFAD) called elementary reliability assessment method are established under the simplified option 1 curve of the 3rd version of CEGB R6. The investigation shows that the distribution of random safety factor and failure probability of a structure only depend on the coordinates of the expectation of P(L-r, K-r) in the failure assessment diagram of the simplified option 1 curve and is not influenced by the other factors. The investigation further shows that the failure probability will decrease with the increase of the initial crack length if the expectation of P(L-r, K-r) keeps unchanged. A conservative result will be,given when using the PFAD as an elementary reliability analysis method to assess the integrity of a structure and only a simple procedure is required like the deterministic assessment method given in CEGB R6. When the secondary stress exists, the conservativeness of the result assessed will increase with the increase of parameter rho although the PFAD is only established based on considering primary stress. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 662
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BERGMAN M, 1991, 9101 SAFOU
[2]  
DUFRESNE J, 1981, 5TH INT C FRACT CANN, V2, P517
[3]  
Haugen E. B., 1980, PROBABILISTIC MECH D
[4]  
LIU CJ, 1996, THESIS QINGDAO I CHE
[5]  
MARSHALL W, 1976, ASSESSMENT INTEGRITY
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF THE INTEGRITY OF STRUCTURES CONTAINING DEFECTS [J].
MILNE, I ;
AINSWORTH, RA ;
DOWLING, AR ;
STEWART, AT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 1988, 32 (1-4) :3-104
[7]  
SCHULER GI, 1981, ZUVERLASSIGKEITSBEUR
[8]  
WANG ZW, 1997, PRESSURE VESSEL TECH, V14, P101
[9]  
1985, PRESSURE VESSEL TECH, V2, P2