Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members

被引:78
作者
Yusuf, TE [1 ]
Baron, TH [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.034
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pancreatic pseudocysts can be drained endoscopically via the transpapillary or the transmural routes. We sought to assess endoscopic methods of pseudocyst drainage. Methods: A web-based Survey was sent to American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) members in the United States (U.S.) and internationally Results: Of the 3054 endoscopists to whom the Survey was sent, 266 (8.7%) replied; 198 performed pseudocyst drainage (103 [52%] ASGE members from the United States and 95 [48%] international members). The median of the total number of drainages per physician was 15 (range 1-364). The transgastric route was the most commonly used drainage route (65%). Transmural entry was performed by using a needle-knife in 53% of transmural drainages that were not EUS-guided. The number of stents placed ranged from 1 to 5 and these remained in place for 2 to 30 weeks. CT scan was used before drainage by 95% of all respondents. EUS imaging was used before drainage by 72 of 103 (70%) US endoscopists compared with 56 of 95 (59%) international endoscopists (p = 0.1). EUS-guided drainage was used by 56% of US endoscopists compared with 43% international endoscopists (p = 0.06). Conclusions: The most common site of transmural entry for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts appears to be the transgastric route. Although CT is the most commonly used predrainage imaging modality, EUS is used before and during transmural drainage of pseudocysts in both the U.S. and abroad, particularly in academic medical centers. Use of EUS before or during drainage does not appear to be significantly different among endoscopists in the United States and internationally.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 227
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bahari H M, 1982, Med J Malaysia, V37, P316
[2]   EUS-guided transesophageal pancreatic pseudocyst drainage [J].
Baron, TH ;
Wiersema, MJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (04) :545-549
[3]  
Baron Todd H, 2003, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V13, P743, DOI 10.1016/S1052-5157(03)00100-4
[4]   ENDOSCOPIC PSEUDOCYST DRAINAGE - A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR SIMPLIFIED CYSTOENTEROSTOMY [J].
BINMOELLER, KF ;
SEIFERT, H ;
SOEHENDRA, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (01) :112-112
[5]   Approaches to the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Brugge, WR .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 20 (05) :488-492
[6]   Evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions with EUS [J].
Brugge, WR .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (06) :698-707
[7]   ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC CYSTOGASTROSTOMY USING THE ND-YAG LASER [J].
BUCHI, KN ;
BOWERS, JH ;
DIXON, JA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1986, 32 (02) :112-114
[8]   ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF CYSTS AND PSEUDOCYSTS IN CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER 7 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE [J].
CREMER, M ;
DEVIERE, J ;
ENGELHOLM, L .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (01) :1-9
[9]   An endoscopic perspective on pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Fazel A. .
Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2005, 7 (2) :107-113
[10]   Endosonographic imaging of pancreatic pseudocysts before endoscopic transmural drainage [J].
Fockens, P ;
Johnson, TG ;
vanDullemen, HM ;
Huibregtse, K ;
Tytgat, GNJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 46 (05) :412-416