Critical evaluation of the Vitek GNS F6 card results compared to standardized, reference susceptibility test methods

被引:6
作者
Jones, RN
Marshall, SA
Zerva, L
机构
[1] Medical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, Univ. of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
[2] Department of Pathology, 5232 RCP, Univ. of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(97)89157-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
A large number of Enterobacteriaceae (291 unselected and 30 clinical challenge isolates) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the Vitek GNS-F6 susceptibility testing card for 10 antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, mezlocillin, ofloxacin, piperacillin, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin/clavulanate). Results were compared to reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. Highest interpretive error on initial processing were observed with ticarcillin/clavulanate (very major false-susceptible error, 3.4%), imipenem (major false-resistant error, 1.9%), and ampicillin/sulbactam (minor error, 15.9%). Repeat testing re solved many very major errors (22 of 41 results), and the overall accuracy rate was improved from 92.1 to 93.4%. Analysis of all minor interpretive errors demonstrated that the trend for Vitek was to report slightly lower MICs (6 of 10 drugs; 97 of 159 results) in comparison to the reference test results. If a heavy inoculum was used in the Vitek cards, false resistance was observed more frequently with aztreonam and penicillins. These data demonstrate that susceptibility testing accuracy with Vitek GNS-F6 card based on categorical agreement varies from 83.2% (ampicillin/sulbactam) to 99.4% (ciprofloxacin) when testing enteric bacilli. Some antimicrobial agents (beta-lactamase inhibitor/penicillin combinations, antipseudomonal penicillins) may require slight modification of interpretive software. Finally, the overall accuracy of the Vitek System was greater than 91% for 9 of 10 drugs tested with a very low, acceptable rate of false-susceptible error (0.8%). (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   INTERPRETIVE ERRORS USING AN AUTOMATED-SYSTEM FOR THE SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF IMIPENEM AND AZTREONAM [J].
BIEDENBACH, DJ ;
JONES, RN .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1995, 21 (01) :57-60
[2]  
DOERN GV, 1996, IN PRESS DIAGN MICRO
[3]  
FERRARO MJ, 1995, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO, pCH118
[4]   SELECTION CRITERIA FOR AN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING SYSTEM [J].
JORGENSEN, JH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (11) :2841-2844
[5]   SERIOUS INTERPRETIVE ERROR AMONG 3 COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF AZTREONAM [J].
MARSHALL, SA ;
JONES, R ;
BEAVIS, K ;
DOERN, GV ;
EVANGELISTA, A ;
HIGGINS, M ;
HORVAT, R ;
PAPASIAN, C ;
PIPER, D ;
RAICH, T ;
CLARRIDGE, JE ;
RUPP, M ;
SCHAEFFER, F ;
SCHECHTERLY, C ;
STIERITZ, D ;
WINN, W .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1995, 22 (03) :249-251
[6]  
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), 1993, METH DIL ANT SUSC TE, V3rd ed.
[7]  
*NCCLS, 1993, PERF STAND ANT DISK
[8]   INVITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY STUDIES OF VANCOMYCIN-RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS [J].
SAHM, DF ;
KISSINGER, J ;
GILMORE, MS ;
MURRAY, PR ;
MULDER, R ;
SOLLIDAY, J ;
CLARKE, B .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (09) :1588-1591
[9]   FAILURE OF THE VITEK AUTOMICROBIC SYSTEM TO DETECT BETA-LACTAM RESISTANCE IN AEROMONAS SPECIES [J].
SCHADOW, KH ;
GIGER, DK ;
SANDERS, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 100 (03) :308-310
[10]  
*USFDA, 1991, FED GUID REV CRIT AS