Job accessibility as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure: a comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo

被引:103
作者
Kawabata, M
Shen, Q
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Syst & Informat Engn, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Architecture Planning & Preservat, Urban Studies & Planning Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1068/b31144
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Studies suggest that sprawling and auto-oriented development patterns present more difficulties for people without cars to access economic opportunities. We examine intrametropolitan and intermetropolitan variations in job accessibility by commuting mode as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure, selecting Boston, Los Angeles, and Tokyo as study areas. Although in both US and Japanese metropolitan areas, job accessibility is significantly lower for public transit users than for auto users, job accessibility for public transit users in the US cases is strikingly lower than in Tokyo. The international comparison provides a clear picture of the significant disadvantage in accessing job opportunities encountered by US workers who are unable to use private vehicles. The empirical results uncover an important dimension of urban structure that deserves much attention from planners and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 130
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
*AASHTO, 2002, CENS TRANSP PLANN PA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ONCE THERE WERE GREE
[3]  
Banister D., 2002, TRANSPORT PLANNING
[4]  
Boarnet MarlonGary., 2001, Travel by Design the Influence of Urban Form on Travel
[5]  
Caïd N, 2002, P I CIVIL ENG-TRANSP, V153, P219
[6]  
DEAKIN E, 2001, 200103 WP U CAL I UR
[7]  
DEAKIN E, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1792, P1, DOI DOI 10.3141/1792-01
[8]  
*FHWA, 2001, HPIP1101EW FHWA US D
[9]  
*FHWA, 2001, FHWAPL02006 US DEP T
[10]   Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: the implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands [J].
Geurs, KT ;
van Eck, JRR .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2003, 30 (01) :69-87