Measurement of radial artery spasm using an automatic pullback device

被引:33
作者
Kiemeneij, F [1 ]
Vajifdar, BU [1 ]
Eccleshall, SC [1 ]
Laarman, G [1 ]
Slagboom, T [1 ]
van der Wieken, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Amsterdam Dept Intervent Cardiol, NL-1090 HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
transradial; cardiac; catheterization; coronary; angiography; intervention;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.1307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Current evaluation of radial artery spasm (RAS), a frequent finding during the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty (TRA), is subjective. A quantitative measure of RAS will help in evaluation and comparison of management strategies. The objectives of the study were to assess the feasibility and safety of using an automatic pullback device (APD) for removal of transradial introducer sheaths and to establish a parameter to quantify RAS. In 50 consecutive transradial procedures, the APD was used to measure the force required for sheath removal. The mean maximal pullback force (MPF) was 0.53 +/- 0.52 kg (range, 0.1-3.0 kg). In 48 (96%) cases, the MPF was reached within the first 5 sec of pullback. All patients with clinical RAS (n = 4) had an MPF greater than 1.0 kg, while the remaining had an MPF less than 1.0 kg. All patients with severe pain during sheath removal (n = 3) had an MPF greater than 1.0 kg, while no patient with an MPF less than 1.0 kg had severe pain. It is feasible and safe to remove transradial introducer sheaths using the APD. The MPF is achieved within the first 5 sec of pullback and is a reliable parameter to quantify RAS. An MPF more than 1.0 kg correlates with clinical RAS and is associated with severe pain during sheath removal. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 441
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Cable DG, 1998, CIRCULATION, V98, pII15
[2]   Transradial approach for vertebral artery stenting: Technical case report [J].
Fessler, RD ;
Wakhloo, AK ;
Lanzino, G ;
Guterman, LR ;
Hopkins, LN .
NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 46 (06) :1524-1527
[3]  
Goldberg SL, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V44, P147, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199806)44:2<147::AID-CCD5>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-1
[5]   Characteristics of adrenoceptors in the human radial artery: Clinical implications [J].
He, GW ;
Yang, CQ .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (05) :1136-1141
[6]   Coronary angiography from the radial artery - experience, complications and limitations [J].
Hildick-Smith, DJR ;
Lowe, MD ;
Walsh, JT ;
Ludman, PF ;
Stephens, NG ;
Schofield, PM ;
Stone, DL ;
Shapiro, LM ;
Petch, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 64 (03) :231-239
[7]   TRANSRADIAL ARTERY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
KIEMENEIJ, F ;
LAARMAN, GJ ;
DEMELKER, E .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 129 (01) :1-7
[8]   Outpatient coronary stent implantation [J].
Kiemeneij, F ;
Laarman, GJ ;
Slagboom, T ;
vanderWieken, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (02) :323-327
[9]   A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study [J].
Kiemeneij, F ;
Laarman, GJ ;
Odekerken, D ;
Slagboom, T ;
vanderWieken, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (06) :1269-1275
[10]   Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: A comparison of radial versus femoral access sites [J].
Mann, T ;
Cubeddu, G ;
Bowen, J ;
Schneider, JE ;
Arrowood, M ;
Newman, WN ;
Zellinger, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (03) :572-576