Differences in endothelial function and morphologic modulation between canine autogenous venous and arterial grafts: Endothelium and intimal thickening

被引:19
作者
Komori, K [1 ]
Inoguchi, H [1 ]
Kume, M [1 ]
Shoji, T [1 ]
Furuyama, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Sci, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 812, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1067/msy.2002.119797
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Late graft failure is still a problem for vascular surgeons. A previous study showed superior patency of arterial grafts compared with venous grafts. In this review we discuss the differences in functional and morphologic modulation of experimental autogenous venous and arterial grafts. Results. In canine venous grafts, the endothelium of the graft was denuded and recovered within 3 or 4 weeks. In contrast, in arterial grafts, denudation of the endothelium was minimal, and no platelet adherence was observed. Instead, nearly normal intact endothelial cell surface had coveted the intima within 3 days after grafting. The histologic findings for arterial grafts thus were quite different from those for venous grafts. Different responses to flow changes between venous and arterial grafts were observed. In the venous grafts, pronounced intimal thickening was associated with impairment of endothelial responses, whereas in the arterial grafts, intact endothelial function and no intimal thickening were observed. Conclusions. The intact endothelial function and absence of intimal thickening under the arterial grafts may explain the superior patency of autogenous arterial grafts in comparison with venous grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:S249 / S255
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
BARNER HB, 1985, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V90, P668
[2]   Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with nonreversed greater saphenous vein [J].
Belkin, M ;
Knox, J ;
Donaldson, MC ;
Mannick, JA ;
Whittemore, AD .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (06) :957-962
[3]  
BERGUER R, 1980, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V115, P332
[4]   THE BIOLOGY OF SAPHENOUS-VEIN GRAFT OCCLUSION - ETIOLOGY AND STRATEGIES FOR PREVENTION [J].
BRYAN, AJ ;
ANGELINI, GD .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 9 (06) :641-649
[5]  
Butany JW, 1998, CAN J CARDIOL, V14, P671
[6]  
CHAIKHOUNI A, 1986, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V92, P88
[7]  
CHERVU A, 1990, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V171, P433
[8]   VEIN COMPLIANCE - A PREOPERATIVE INDICATOR OF VEIN MORPHOLOGY AND OF VEINS AT RISK OF VASCULAR GRAFT STENOSIS [J].
DAVIES, AH ;
MAGEE, TR ;
BAIRD, RN ;
SHEFFIELD, E ;
HORROCKS, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) :1019-1021
[9]   PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF VEIN GRAFT FAILURE - A REVIEW [J].
DAVIES, MG ;
HAGEN, PO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 9 (01) :7-18
[10]  
DOBRIN PB, 1989, SURGERY, V105, P393