Independent evaluation of the ability of spaceborne radar and lidar to retrieve the microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds

被引:23
作者
Hogan, RJ
Donovan, DP
Tinel, C
Brooks, ME
Bouniol, D
Illingworth, AJ
Baptista, JPVP
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[2] Royal Dutch Meteorol Inst, De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Etude Environm Terrestre & Planetaires, Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, Paris, France
[4] European Space Agcy, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JTECH1837.1
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The combination of radar and lidar in space offers the unique potential to retrieve vertical profiles of ice water content and particle size globally, and two algorithms developed recently claim to have overcome the principal difficulty with this approach-that of correcting the lidar signal for extinction. In this paper "blind tests" of these algorithms are carried out, using realistic 94-GHz radar and 355-nm lidar backscatter profiles simulated from aircraft-measured size spectra, and including the effects of molecular scattering, multiple scattering, and instrument noise. Radiation calculations are performed on the true and retrieved microphysical profiles to estimate the accuracy with which radiative flux profiles could be inferred remotely. It is found that the visible extinction profile can be retrieved independent of assumptions on the nature of the size distribution, the habit of the particles, the mean extinction-to-backscatter ratio, or errors in instrument calibration. Local errors in retrieved extinction can occur in proportion to local fluctuations in the extinction-to-backscatter ratio, but down to 400 m above the height of the lowest lidar return, optical depth is typically retrieved to better than 0.2. Retrieval uncertainties are greater at the far end of the profile, and errors in total optical depth can exceed 1, which changes the shortwave radiative effect of the cloud by around 20%. Longwave fluxes are much less sensitive to errors in total optical depth, and may generally be calculated to better than 2 W m(-2) throughout the profile. It is important for retrieval algorithms to account for the effects of lidar multiple scattering, because if this is neglected, then optical depth is underestimated by approximately 35%, resulting in cloud radiative effects being underestimated by around 30% in the shortwave and 15% in the longwave. Unlike the extinction coefficient, the inferred ice water content and particle size can vary by 30%, depending on the assumed mass-size relationship (a problem common to all remote retrieval algorithms). However, radiative fluxes are almost completely determined by the extinction profile, and if this is correct, then errors in these other parameters have only a small effect in the shortwave (around 6%, compared to that of clear sky) and a negligible effect in the longwave.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 227
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT OF EXTINCTION AND BACKSCATTER PROFILES IN CIRRUS CLOUDS BY USING A COMBINED RAMAN ELASTIC-BACKSCATTER LIDAR [J].
ANSMANN, A ;
WANDINGER, U ;
RIEBESELL, M ;
WEITKAMP, C ;
MICHAELIS, W .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1992, 31 (33) :7113-7131
[2]   Testing the coherence of cirrus microphysical and bulk properties retrieved from dual-viewing multispectral satellite radiance measurements [J].
Baran, AJ ;
Watts, PD ;
Francis, PN .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D24) :31673-31683
[3]  
BROWN PRA, 1995, J APPL METEOROL, V34, P2346, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2346:TROSMW>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
BROWN PRA, 1995, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V12, P410, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0410:IMOTIW>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Ice-cloud effective particle size parameterization based on combined lidar, radar reflectivity, and mean Doppler velocity measurements [J].
Donovan, DP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D18)
[8]   Cloud effective particle size and water content profile retrievals using combined lidar and radar observations - 1. Theory and examples [J].
Donovan, DP ;
van Lammeren, ACAP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D21) :27425-27448
[9]   Studies with a flexible new radiation code .1. Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model [J].
Edwards, JM ;
Slingo, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 122 (531) :689-719
[10]   Practical model for the calculation of multiply scattered lidar returns [J].
Eloranta, EW .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 37 (12) :2464-2472