Risk factors for difficult delivery in nulliparas with epidural analgesia in second stage of labor

被引:21
作者
Fraser, WD
Cayer, M
Soeder, BM
Turcot, L
Marcoux, S
机构
[1] CHUQ, Hop St Francois Dassise, Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1L 3L5, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Laval, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01755-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for difficult delivery among nulliparas in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia, and to develop a multivariable model that is predictive of difficult delivery. METHODS: The database is derived from a multicenter randomized trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women under continuous infusion epidural. Members of this cohort (n = 1862) were randomly divided into two groups: a ''Model Development'' and a ''Model Validation'' group. We used univariate and multivariable techniques to assess associations between anthropometric, sociodemographic, and obstetric variables and difficult delivery. RESULTS: With the referent defined as the category of lesser risk, the developed model showed that the risk of difficult delivery was increased for women with height less than 160 cm (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 90% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 3.4), prepregnancy weight greater than 65 kg (OR 1.6, 90% CI 1.0, 2.6), age greater than or equal to 35 years (OR 3.0, 90% CI 1.1, 8.1), and gestational age greater than or equal to 41 weeks (OR 1.8, 90% CI 1.1, 2.8). Induction of epidural analgesia late in labor (greater than or equal to 6 cm) was associated with a higher risk of difficult delivery than induction between 3 and 5 cm (OR 1.9, 90% CI 1.3, 2.8). An interval of greater than or equal to 360 minutes between epidural induction and full dilatation increased the risk of difficult delivery (OR 3.8, 90% CI 1.5, 9.5). Fetal station above +2 at full dilatation and a posterior fetal position were both strongly associated with difficult delivery (OR 2.7, 90% CI 1.4, 5.0, and OR 11.2, 90% CI 4.9, 25.6, respectively). For the multivariable predictive model, when the sensitivity was 57%, the specificity was 75%, and the positive predictive value was 35%. CONCLUSION: Our observations concerning maternal characteristics and obstetric variables are consistent with previous observations with the exception of time of induction of the epidural. The predictive model may be useful in defining high-risk populations for subsequent intervention studies designed to assess approaches to reduce difficult delivery. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 418
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1988, 59 AM COLL OBST GYN
[2]   AN EVALUATION OF BUPIVACAINE IN EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR OBSTETRICS [J].
BROMAGE, PR .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1969, 16 (01) :46-&
[3]   DOES EARLY ADMINISTRATION OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AFFECT OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN WHO ARE RECEIVING INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN [J].
CHESTNUT, DH ;
VINCENT, RD ;
MCGRATH, JM ;
CHOI, WW ;
BATES, JN .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (06) :1193-1200
[4]   THE INFLUENCE OF CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE ANALGESIA ON THE 2ND STAGE OF LABOR AND METHOD OF DELIVERY IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN [J].
CHESTNUT, DH ;
VANDEWALKER, GE ;
OWEN, CL ;
BATES, JN ;
CHOI, WW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (06) :774-780
[5]   RELATION OF PRIVATE OR CLINIC CARE TO THE CESAREAN BIRTH-RATE [J].
DEREGT, RH ;
MINKOFF, HL ;
FELDMAN, J ;
SCHWARZ, RH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (10) :619-624
[6]   Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia [J].
Fraser, WD ;
Marcoux, S ;
Krauss, I ;
Douglass, J ;
Goulet, C ;
Boulvain, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1165-1172
[7]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OBSTETRICIANS IN CESAREAN-SECTION RATES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR [J].
GUILLEMETTE, J ;
FRASER, WD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (02) :105-108
[8]  
HAGADORNFREATHY AS, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P356
[9]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TRANS-CUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION (TENS), ENTONOX, PETHIDINE+PROMAZINE AND LUMBAR EPIDURAL FOR PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR [J].
HARRISON, RF ;
SHORE, M ;
WOODS, T ;
MATHEWS, G ;
GARDINER, J ;
UNWIN, A .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 66 (01) :9-14
[10]  
HOWELL C, 2000, EPIDURAL VERSUS NONE