Assessing the vitamin D status of the US population

被引:303
作者
Yetley, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Off Dietary Supplements, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ajcn/88.2.558S
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
This article describes the information currently available in the National Nutrition Monitoring System that is relevant to assessing the vitamin D status of US population groups, the strengths and limitations of this information, and selected results of vitamin D nutritional status assessments. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) provides information on vitamin D intakes only from 1988 to 1994. NHANES collected information on supplement use and circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations from 1988 through current surveys. The National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference started providing limited data on the vitamin D content of foods in 2002 and continues to update these values. The Food Label and Package Survey provides 2006-2007 label information on vitamin D fortification of marketed foods. Despite limitations in the available data and controversies about appropriate criteria for evaluating vitamin D status among population groups, we can make some useful comparisons of vitamin D status among life-stage groups. In general, males have higher vitamin D intakes and 25(OH)D concentrations than do females. Children tend to have higher vitamin D status than adults. The increasing use of multivitamin-mineral dietary supplements in younger to older adults is not associated with a corresponding increase in serum 25(OH)D concentrations. In general, leaner individuals have higher circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D and supplement use than do heavier individuals. Finally, non-Hispanic whites tend to have higher vitamin D status than do non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans.
引用
收藏
页码:558S / 564S
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NAT HLTH NUTR EX SUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT NUTR DAT STAND R
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DIET REF INT CALC PH
[5]  
[Anonymous], Federal Register
[6]   Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: A call for standardization [J].
Binkley, N ;
Krueger, D ;
Cowgill, CS ;
Plum, L ;
Lake, E ;
Hansen, KE ;
DeLuca, HF ;
Drezner, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (07) :3152-3157
[7]   Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes [J].
Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A. ;
Giovannucci, Edward ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Dietrich, Thomas ;
Dawson-Hughes, Bess .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2006, 84 (01) :18-28
[8]  
Blake CJ, 2007, J AOAC INT, V90, P897
[9]  
Blake CJ, 2005, J AOAC INT, V88, P325
[10]  
BRIEFEL RR, 1995, AM J CLIN NUTR, V62, P1072