Evaluation of the Monark Wingate Ergometer by direct measurement of resistance and velocity

被引:17
作者
MacIntosh, BR [1 ]
Bryan, SN [1 ]
Rishaug, P [1 ]
Norris, SR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Kinesiol, Human Performance Lab, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE | 2001年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
power; anaerobic power; moment of inertia; cycle ergometer;
D O I
10.1139/h01-030
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the new basket-loaded Wingate ergometer introduced by Monark (Model 834E). Velocity was measured directly from the pedal switch while tension was measured with transducers on each end of the brake lacing. Moment of inertia of the flywheel was determined and accounted for in the calculation of power Constant load tests (39.24 to 98.1 N), were done at pedaling speeds from 80 to 140 r . min(-1) (flywheel angular velocity = 30-50 rad . s(-1)). The load transmitted to the lacing at the front and back of the flywheel was 95.5 +/- 0.8% (mean+/-SEM) and 6 71 +/- 0.8%, respectively, of the load in the basket. Thus, the resultant tension (front minus back) was on average 88.8 +/- 0.57% of the applied load. The velocity recorded by the Monark Wingate Ergometer computer program (MWECP) was the same (100.4 +/- 1.56%) as that determined from the pedal switch directly. Five male mountain bikers performed a 30-3 all-out test. Peak power calculated by MWECP (1181 +/- 55W) was always higher (p < .01) than that calculated from direct measures of tension and velocity (1102 +/- 66W), when not taking into account the moment of inertia. These experiments suggest that the basket-loaded Monark Wingate ergometer does not provide a correct calculation of power because of incomplete load transmission to the flywheel.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 558
页数:16
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Muscle function during brief maximal exercise: Accurate measurements on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer [J].
Arsac, LM ;
Belli, A ;
Lacour, JR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 74 (1-2) :100-106
[2]  
BAROR O, 1977, ISRAEL J MED SCI, V13, P326
[3]   THE WINGATE ANAEROBIC TEST - AN UPDATE ON METHODOLOGY, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY [J].
BAROR, O .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (06) :381-394
[4]   CORRECTING THE WINGATE TEST FOR CHANGES IN KINETIC-ENERGY OF THE ERGOMETER FLYWHEEL [J].
BASSETT, DR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 10 (06) :446-449
[5]  
BEDU M, 1991, J APPL PHYSIOL, V70, P1031, DOI 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.3.1031
[6]   The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test [J].
Coleman, SGS ;
Hale, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 1998, 23 (04) :409-417
[7]  
Jacobs I., 1980, INT J SPORTS MED, V1, P21, DOI [10.1055/s-2008-1034625, DOI 10.1055/S-2008-1034625]
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF WORK AND POWER OUTPUT USING FRICTION-LOADED CYCLE ERGOMETERS [J].
LAKOMY, HKA .
ERGONOMICS, 1986, 29 (04) :509-517
[9]  
MacDougall J.D., 1991, PHYSL TESTING HIGH P
[10]   Paced effort and all-out 30-second power tests [J].
MacIntosh, BR ;
MacEachern, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 18 (08) :594-599