The evolution of worker caste diversity in social insects

被引:113
作者
Fjerdingstad, EJ
Crozier, RH
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7625, Ecol Lab, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[2] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Trop Biol, Evolutionary Genet Lab, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
colony; kin selection; policing; polyandry and polygyny; polymorphism;
D O I
10.1086/499545
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Morphological diversification of workers is predicted to improve the division of labor within social insect colonies, yet many species have monomorphic workers. Individual- level selection on the reproductive capacities of workers may counter colony- level selection for diversification, and life- history differences between species ( timing of caste determination, colony size, genetic variation available) may mediate the strength of this selection. We tested this through phylogenetically independent contrast analyses on a new data set for 35 ant species. Evidence was found that early divergence of queen-worker developmental pathways may facilitate the evolution of worker diversity because queen- worker dimorphism was strongly positively associated with diversity. By contrast, risks for colonies that invest in specialized workers and colony size effects on costs of worker reproduction seem unlikely to strongly affect the evolution of worker diversity because there was no significant association between colony size and diversity when controlling statistically for queen- worker dimorphism. Finally, worker diversity was greater in species with multiple lineages per colony, and it was negatively associated with relatedness in monogynous species. This could be due to high intracolonial genetic variance favoring the expression and evolution of great worker diversity or to diversity evolving more easily when there is selection for repression of worker reproduction ( worker policing).
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 400
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Evolution of the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants [J].
Abouheif, E ;
Wray, GA .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5579) :249-252
[2]   Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queueing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency [J].
Anderson, C ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 154 (05) :521-535
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social insect colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[4]  
BESHERS SN, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P763, DOI 10.2307/1941733
[5]  
BOURKE A.F.G., 1995, Social evolution in ants
[6]   Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects [J].
Bourke, AFG .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1999, 12 (02) :245-257
[7]   WORKER REPRODUCTION IN THE HIGHER EUSOCIAL HYMENOPTERA [J].
BOURKE, AFG .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1988, 63 (03) :291-311
[8]  
BREED MD, 1988, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V61, P285
[9]   Regulation of brood-care behavior in the dimorphic castes of the ant Pheidole morrisi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae):: Effects of caste ratio, colony size, and colony needs [J].
Brown, JJ ;
Traniello, JFA .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 1998, 11 (02) :209-219
[10]  
Brown MJF, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P2067, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00386.x