GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

被引:524
作者
Dunne, John P. [1 ]
John, Jasmin G. [1 ]
Shevliakova, Elena [2 ]
Stouffer, Ronald J. [1 ]
Krasting, John P. [1 ,3 ]
Malyshev, Sergey L. [2 ]
Milly, P. C. D. [1 ,4 ]
Sentman, Lori T. [1 ]
Adcroft, Alistair J. [5 ]
Cooke, William [3 ]
Dunne, Krista A. [1 ,4 ]
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Hallberg, Robert W. [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew J. [1 ]
Levy, Hiram [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Phillips, Peter J. [1 ]
Zadeh, Niki [3 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] DRC GFDL, High Performance Technol Grp, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Princeton Univ, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC CO2; PHYTOPLANKTON GROWTH; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; DIOXIDE UPTAKE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; CYCLE; PRODUCTIVITY; VARIABILITY; EXCHANGE; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon-climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences in simulation characteristics of these two models are described. Because of differences in oceanic ventilation rates, ESM2M has a stronger biological carbon pump but weaker northward implied atmospheric CO2 transport than ESM2G. The major advantages of ESM2G over ESM2M are improved representation of surface chlorophyll in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans and thermocline nutrients and oxygen in the North Pacific. Improved tree mortality parameters in ESM2G produced more realistic carbon accumulation in vegetation pools. The major advantages of ESM2M over ESM2G are reduced nutrient and oxygen biases in the southern and tropical oceans.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2267
页数:21
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   INCREASES IN TERRESTRIAL CARBON STORAGE FROM THE LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM TO THE PRESENT [J].
ADAMS, JM ;
FAURE, H ;
FAUREDENARD, L ;
MCGLADE, JM ;
WOODWARD, FI .
NATURE, 1990, 348 (6303) :711-714
[2]   ON THE HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN-CONTENT OF MARINE-PHYTOPLANKTON [J].
ANDERSON, LA .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART I-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 1995, 42 (09) :1675-1680
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NOAA ATLAS NESDIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NOAA ATLAS NESDIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], IGBP GLOBAL CHANGE N
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DISSOLVED OXYGEN APP
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DESIGN OCMIP 2 SIMUL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 15 COMM SCI IND RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], Olson's Major World Ecosytem Complexes Ranked by Carbon in Live Vegetation