The use of TMA for interlaboratory validation of FISH testing for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer

被引:28
作者
Diaz, LK
Gupta, R
Kidwai, N
Sneige, N
Wiley, EL
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
breast cancer; HER2; quality assurance; in situ hybridization;
D O I
10.1177/002215540405200408
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for breast cancer is largely limited to academic centers and commercial laboratories. As testing demands increase, methods for rapid and cost-effective technical validation and quality assessment will be required. Tissue microarray (TMA), a technique for high-throughput biomarker evaluation, could help facilitate these needs. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of TMA technology for validation of HER2 FISH testing. Two TMA blocks containing paired cores from 41 breast cancers were constructed. HER2 FISH was performed in parallel at two institutions and the results compared. One institution, with considerable HER2 FISH experience, served as the reference laboratory. HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochernistry (IHC) were compared to the FISH results. For positive and negative results, the concordance rate between laboratories was 100%. Using kappa statistical analysis to determine interobserver agreement, HER2 to chromosome 17 gene copy ratios showed strong agreement between laboratories with kappa = 0.85 (perfect agreement 1.0). Four cases displaying low-level amplification by CISH contained chromosome 17 polysomy and gene copy ratios of <2.0 by FISH. Good concordance was observed between HER2 IHC and in situ hybridization testing. TMA is a robust and effective method for the technical validation of HER2 FISH testing and should be considered for use by quality assessment programs.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 507
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Testing for erbB-2 by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer [J].
Allred, DC ;
Swanson, PE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 113 (02) :171-175
[2]   Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer [J].
Bartlett, JMS ;
Going, JJ ;
Mallon, EA ;
Watters, AD ;
Reeves, JR ;
Stanton, P ;
Richmond, J ;
Donald, B ;
Ferrier, R ;
Cooke, TG .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 195 (04) :422-428
[3]  
BATTIFORA H, 1986, LAB INVEST, V55, P244
[4]   Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma [J].
Camp, RL ;
Charette, LA ;
Rimm, DL .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2000, 80 (12) :1943-1949
[5]   Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease [J].
Cobleigh, MA ;
Vogel, CL ;
Tripathy, D ;
Robert, NJ ;
Scholl, S ;
Fehrenbacher, L ;
Wolter, JM ;
Paton, V ;
Shak, S ;
Lieberman, G ;
Slamon, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2639-2648
[6]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[7]  
Diaz N M, 2001, Cancer Control, V8, P415
[8]   Recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK [J].
Ellis, IO ;
Dowsett, M ;
Bartlett, J ;
Walker, R ;
Cooke, T ;
Gullick, W ;
Gusterson, B ;
Mallon, E ;
Lee, PB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (12) :890-892
[9]  
Field AS, 2001, PATHOLOGY, V33, P278
[10]   Reliability of the tissue microarray based FISH for evaluation of the HER-2 oncogene in breast carcinoma [J].
Gancberg, D ;
Di Leo, A ;
Rouas, G ;
Järvinen, T ;
Verhest, A ;
Isola, J ;
Piccart, MJ ;
Larsimont, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (04) :315-317