Skin cancer and inorganic arsenic: Uncertainty-status of risk

被引:25
作者
Brown, KG
Guo, HR
Kuo, TL
Greene, HL
机构
[1] NATL CHENG KUNG UNIV,COLL MED,TAINAN 70101,TAIWAN
[2] NATL TAIWAN UNIV,COLL MED,TAIPEI,TAIWAN
[3] ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO,LOS ANGELES,CA 90071
关键词
arsenic; skin cancer; Taiwan; drinking water;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00841.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The current U.S. EPA standard for inorganic arsenic in drinking water is 50 ppb (mu g/L), dating to the National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation of 1976. The current EPA risk analysis predicts an increased lifetime skin cancer risk on the order of 3 or 4 per 1000 from chronic exposure at that concentration. Revision of the standard to only a few ppb, perhaps even less than 1 ppb, may be indicated by the EPA analysis to reduce the lifetime risk to an acceptable level. The cost to water utilities, and ultimately to their consumers, to conform to such a large reduction in the standard could easily reach several billion dollars, so it is particularly important to assess accurately the current risk and the risk reduction that would be achieved by a lower standard. This article addresses the major sources of uncertainty in the EPA analysis with respect to this objective. Specifically, it focuses on uncertainty and variability in the exposure estimates for the landmark study of Tseng and colleagues in Taiwan, analyzed using a reconstruction of the their exposure data. It is concluded that while the available dataset is suitable to establish the hazard of skin cancer, it is too highly summarized for reliable dose-response assessment. A new epidemiologic study is needed, designed for the requirements of dose-response assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] BLACKWELL RO, 1961, J FORMOS MED ASSOC, V69, P1139
  • [2] Borum Denis R., 1994, P21
  • [3] BROWN KG, 1995, IN PRESS P SOC ENV G
  • [4] ARSENIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    CARLSONLYNCH, H
    BECK, BD
    BOARDMAN, PD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 102 (04) : 354 - 356
  • [5] Chen K.P., 1962, MEM COL MED NAT TAIW, V8, P115
  • [6] COHRSSEN JJ, 1989, RISK ANAL GUIDE PRIN
  • [7] Fan A. M., 1994, P275
  • [8] HOEL DG, 1985, METHODS ESTIMATING R, P347
  • [9] HUMAN STUDIES DO NOT SUPPORT THE METHYLATION THRESHOLD HYPOTHESIS FOR THE TOXICITY OF INORGANIC ARSENIC
    HOPENHAYNRICH, C
    SMITH, AH
    GOEDEN, HM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 60 (02) : 161 - 177
  • [10] KREWSKI D, 1985, MODERN STAT METHODS, P259