How similar must the Fourier spectra of the frames of a random-dot kinematogram be to support motion perception?

被引:12
作者
Ledgeway, T [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON,ROYAL HOLLOWAY & BEDFORD NEW COLL,DEPT PSYCHOL,EGHAM TW20 0EX,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
motion perception; random-dot; kinematograms; band-pass filter;
D O I
10.1016/0042-6989(95)00315-0
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Direction-discrimination performance was measured for two-frame random-dot kinematograms in which one or both frames were spatial frequency filtered with a one octave band-pass filter and the centre frequency of this filter was varied in the range 0.75-9 c/deg independently for each frame. When both frames were filtered so that they contained common (overlapping) spatial frequencies direction discrimination was extremely good but it deteriorated rapidly as the degree of spectral overlap between the two frames decreased. These results are consistent with previous findings that suggest that the mechanisms that mediate the initial stages of motion detection are narrowly tuned for spatial frequency and cannot combine information conveyed at disparate frequencies in order to compute an unambiguous estimate of the direction of local motion, However, when only one of the frames was band-pass filtered and the other was unfiltered (broadband), the correct direction of stimulus motion could be discriminated reliably for a broad range of filter centre frequencies. Performance was best when the centre frequency of the filtered frame was at medium spatial frequencies and tended to deteriorate as the centre frequency approached either extreme of the spatial frequency range examined, This basic pattern of results may be attributed to the visual system's differential sensitivity to the Fourier components present in the unfiltered frame. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2489 / 2495
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   SPATIOTEMPORAL ENERGY MODELS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION [J].
ADELSON, EH ;
BERGEN, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (02) :284-299
[2]   SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SELECTIVITY OF THE HUMAN MOTION DETECTION SYSTEM [J].
ANDERSON, SJ ;
BURR, DC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1985, 25 (08) :1147-1154
[3]   THE PERCEPTION OF APPARENT MOVEMENT [J].
ANSTIS, SM ;
MACKAY, DM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 290 (1038) :153-168
[4]   SHORT-RANGE PROCESS IN APPARENT MOTION [J].
BRADDICK, O .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (07) :519-527
[5]   LOW-LEVEL AND HIGH-LEVEL PROCESSES IN APPARENT MOTION [J].
BRADDICK, OJ ;
RUDDOCK, KH ;
MORGAN, MJ ;
MARR, D .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 290 (1038) :137-151
[6]   SEEING OBJECTS IN MOTION [J].
BURR, DC ;
ROSS, J ;
MORRONE, MC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1986, 227 (1247) :249-265
[7]   ATTENTION-BASED MOTION PERCEPTION [J].
CAVANAGH, P .
SCIENCE, 1992, 257 (5076) :1563-1565
[8]  
Cavanagh P, 1991, Spat Vis, V5, P303, DOI 10.1163/156856891X00065
[9]  
CHANG J J, 1985, Spatial Vision, V1, P39, DOI 10.1163/156856885X00062
[10]   DISPLACEMENT LIMITS FOR SPATIAL-FREQUENCY FILTERED RANDOM-DOT CINEMATOGRAMS IN APPARENT MOTION [J].
CHANG, JJ ;
JULESZ, B .
VISION RESEARCH, 1983, 23 (12) :1379-&