Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks

被引:70
作者
Bashari, H. [1 ]
Smith, C. [2 ]
Bosch, O. J. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Nat Resources, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Nat & Rural Syst Management, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
关键词
Rangeland management; State and transition model; Queensland; Bayesian belief network; Adaptive management; Decision support;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2008.09.003
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
State and transition models provide a simple and versatile way of describing vegetation dynamics in rangelands. However, state and transition models are traditionally descriptive, which has limited their practical application to rangeland management decision support. This paper demonstrates an approach to rangeland management decision support that combines a state and transition model with a Bayesian belief network to provide a relatively simple and updatable rangeland dynamics model that can accommodate uncertainty and be used for scenario, diagnostic, and sensitivity analysis. A state and transition model, developed by the authors for subtropical grassland in south-east Queensland, Australia, is used as an example. From the state and transition model, an influence diagram was built to show the possible transitions among states and the factors influencing each transition. The influence diagram was populated with probabilities to produce a predictive model in the form of a Bayesian belief network. The behaviour of the model was tested using scenario and sensitivity analysis, revealing that selective grazing, grazing pressure, and soil nutrition were believed to influence most transitions, while fire frequency and the frequency of good wet seasons were also important in some transitions. Overall, the integration of a state and transition model with a Bayesian belief network provided a useful way to utilise the knowledge embedded in a state and transition model for predictive purposes. Using a Bayesian belief network in the modelling approach allowed uncertainty and variability to be explicitly accommodated in the modelling process, and expert knowledge to be utilised in model development. The methods used also supported learning from monitoring data, thereby supporting adaptive rangeland management. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 34
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Sagebrush-grass vegetation dynamics: Comparing classical and state-transition models [J].
Allen-Diaz, B ;
Bartolome, JW .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1998, 8 (03) :795-804
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GUIDELINES USING BAY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
Archer S, 1991, GRAZING MANAGEMENT E, P109
[5]  
ASH AJ, 1999, NO AUSTR PROGRAM OCC, V10, P1
[6]  
BELSKY JA, 1992, J VEG SCI, V3, P187, DOI 10.2307/3235679
[7]   Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka [J].
Cain, JD ;
Jinapala, K ;
Makin, IW ;
Somaratna, PG ;
Ariyaratna, BR ;
Perera, LR .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 76 (02) :457-482
[8]   Properties of sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks [J].
Coupé, VMH ;
van der Gaag, LC .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 36 (04) :323-356
[9]   Sensitivity analysis:: an aid for belief-network quantification [J].
Coupé, VMH ;
Van der Gaag, LC ;
Habbema, JDF .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2000, 15 (03) :215-232
[10]  
DRUZDZEL MJ, 1995, P 11 C UNC ART INT, P141