Evidence-based gallbladder cancer staging - A changing cancer staging by analysis of data from the national cancer database

被引:81
作者
Fong, YM
Wagman, L
Gonen, M
Crawford, J
Reed, W
Swanson, R
Pan, C
Ritchey, J
Stewart, A
Choti, M
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Murray F Brennan Chair Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] City Hope Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Commiss Canc, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000219737.81943.4e
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A recent revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for gallbladder cancer (6th Edition) involved some major changes. Most notably, T2N0M0 tumors were moved from stage II to stage IB; T3N1M0 disease was moved from stage III to stage IIB; and T4NxM0 (x = any) tumors were moved from stage IVA to stage III. Methods: In order to determine if these changes were justified by data, an analysis of the 10,705 cases of gallbladder cancer collected between 1989 and 1996 in the NCDB was performed. All patients had >5 year follow-up. Results: The staging according to the 6th Edition provided no discrimination between stage III and IV. Five-year survivals for stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV (6th Edition) were 7%, 9%, 3%, 2% respectively. The data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were used to derive a proposed new staging system that builds upon Edition 5 and had improved discrimination of stage groups over previous editions. Conclusions: Changes in staging systems should be justified by data. Multicenter databases, including the NCDB, represent important resources for verification of evidence-based staging systems.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 774
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Abbruzzese JL, 2000, CANCER J, V6, P282
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1983, MANUAL STAGING CANC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
  • [4] BOOTSTRAPPED CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR THE COX MODEL USING A LINEAR RELATIVE RISK FORM
    BARLOW, WE
    SUN, WH
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (08) : 927 - 935
  • [5] Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer - Implications for staging and management
    Bartlett, DL
    Fong, YM
    Fortner, JG
    Brennan, MF
    Blumgart, LH
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (05) : 639 - 646
  • [6] Should Hepatic Resections Be Performed at High-Volume Referral Centers?
    Choti M.A.
    Bowman H.M.
    Pitt H.A.
    Sosa J.A.
    Sitzmann J.V.
    Cameron J.L.
    Gordon T.A.
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998, 2 (1) : 11 - 20
  • [7] An aggressive surgical approach leads to improved survival in patients with gallbladder cancer - A 12-year study at a North American center
    Dixon, E
    Vollmer, CM
    Sahajpal, A
    Cattral, M
    Grant, D
    Doig, C
    Hemming, A
    Taylor, B
    Langer, B
    Greig, P
    Gallinger, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (03) : 385 - 394
  • [8] Assessment of vital status in Department of Veterans Affairs national databases: Comparison with state death certificates
    Dominitz, JA
    Maynard, C
    Boyko, EJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (05) : 286 - 291
  • [9] DONOHUE JH, 1990, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V125, P237
  • [10] Gallbladder cancer: Comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention
    Fong, Y
    Jarnagin, W
    Blumgart, LH
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (04) : 557 - 566