Banks' advantage in hedging liquidity risk: Theory and evidence from the commercial paper market

被引:248
作者
Gatev, E [1 ]
Strahan, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Natl Bur Econ Res, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00857.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Banks have a unique ability to hedge against market-wide liquidity shocks. Deposit inflows provide funding for loan demand shocks that follow declines in market liquidity. Consequently, banks can insure firms against systematic declines in liquidity at lower cost than other institutions. We provide evidence that when liquidity dries up and commercial paper spreads widen, banks experience funding inflows. These flows allow banks to meet loan demand from borrowers drawing funds from commercial paper backup lines without running down their holdings of liquid assets. We also provide evidence that implicit government support for banks during crises explains these funding flows.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 892
页数:26
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SOME EVIDENCE ON THE EMPIRICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CREDIT RATIONING [J].
BERGER, AN ;
UDELL, GF .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (05) :1047-1077
[2]  
BERGER AN, 2005, UNPUB BANK CAPITAL L
[3]   Deposits and relationship lending [J].
Berlin, M ;
Mester, LJ .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1999, 12 (03) :579-607
[4]  
BERNANKE BS, 1983, AM ECON REV, V73, P257
[5]   COMPETITION, RISK NEUTRALITY AND LOAN COMMITMENTS [J].
BOOT, A ;
THAKOR, AV ;
UDELL, GF .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1987, 11 (03) :449-471
[6]  
BOYD J, 1994, Q REV SUM, P1
[7]  
CALOMIRIS CW, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P497
[8]   Does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ? Evidence on specialization in private debt contracting [J].
Carey, M ;
Post, M ;
Sharpe, SA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, 53 (03) :845-878
[9]  
CHAVA S, 2002, MODELING LOAN COMMIT
[10]  
CONSTANTINIDES GM, 1989, THEORY VALUATION