Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury

被引:166
作者
Collinger, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boninger, Michael L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bruns, Tim M. [2 ]
Curley, Kenneth [5 ]
Wang, Wei [2 ,3 ]
Weber, Douglas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Human Engn Res Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Rehabil Sci & Technol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] USA, Med Res & Mat Command, Ft Detrick, MD USA
关键词
assistive technology; brain-computer interface; disability; function; functional electrical stimulation; neuroprosthetics; priorities; quality of life; spinal cord injury; veterans; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHIC SIGNALS; CORTICAL CONTROL; PATIENT; GRASP; NEUROPROSTHESIS; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; SATISFACTION; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1682/JRRD.2011.11.0213
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often affects a person's ability to perform critical activities of daily living and can negatively affect his or her quality of life. Assistive technology aims to bridge this gap in order to augment function and increase independence. It is critical to involve consumers in the design and evaluation process as new technologies such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are developed. In a survey study of 57 veterans with SCI participating in the 2010 National Veterans Wheelchair Games, we found that restoration of bladder and bowel control, walking, and arm and hand function (tetraplegia only) were all high priorities for improving quality of life. Many of the participants had not used or heard of some currently available technologies designed to improve function or the ability to interact with their environment. The majority of participants in this study were interested in using a BCI, particularly for controlling functional electrical stimulation to restore lost function. Independent operation was considered to be the most important design criteria. Interestingly, many participants reported that they would consider surgery to implant a BCI even though non-invasiveness was a high-priority design requirement. This survey demonstrates the interest of individuals with SCI in receiving and contributing to the design of BCIs.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 159
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries
    Abma, TA
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) : 1310 - 1328
  • [2] Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population
    Anderson, KD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2004, 21 (10) : 1371 - 1383
  • [3] Consideration of user priorities when developing neural prosthetics
    Anderson, Kim D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 6 (05)
  • [4] The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury
    Barker, R. N.
    Kendall, M. D.
    Amsters, D. I.
    Pershouse, K. J.
    Haines, T. P.
    Kuipers, P.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [5] Robust, long-term control of an electrocorticographic brain-computer interface with fixed parameters
    Blakely, Tim
    Miller, Kai J.
    Zanos, Stavros P.
    Rao, Rajesh P. N.
    Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (01)
  • [6] The Role of Assistive Robotics in the Lives of Persons with Disability
    Brose, Steven W.
    Weber, Douglas J.
    Salatin, Ben A.
    Grindle, Garret G.
    Wang, Hongwu
    Vazquez, Juan J.
    Cooper, Rory A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2010, 89 (06) : 509 - 521
  • [7] Brown-Triolo DL, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P659
  • [8] Charlifue S, 2004, NEUROREHABILITATION, V19, P91
  • [9] High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia
    Collinger, Jennifer L.
    Wodlinger, Brian
    Downey, John E.
    Wang, Wei
    Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C.
    Weber, Douglas J.
    McMorland, Angus J. C.
    Velliste, Meel
    Boninger, Michael L.
    Schwartz, Andrew B.
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 381 (9866) : 557 - 564
  • [10] Cooper Rory A, 2010, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.004