Auditory proactive interference in monkeys: The roles of stimulus set size and intertrial interval

被引:11
作者
Bigelow, James [1 ]
Poremba, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Working memory; Delayed matching to sample; Macaque; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; MATCHING-TO-SAMPLE; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; PITCH-COMPARISON TASK; RECOGNITION MEMORY; ANIMAL MEMORY; CEBUS-APELLA; TRIAL; RETENTION; PIGEON;
D O I
10.3758/s13420-013-0107-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We conducted two experiments to examine the influences of stimulus set size (the number of stimuli that are used throughout the session) and intertrial interval (ITI, the elapsed time between trials) in auditory short-term memory in monkeys. We used an auditory delayed matching-to-sample task wherein the animals had to indicate whether two sounds separated by a 5-s retention interval were the same (match trials) or different (nonmatch trials). In Experiment 1, we randomly assigned stimulus set sizes of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, or 192 (trial-unique) for each session of 128 trials. Consistent with previous visual studies, overall accuracy was consistently lower when smaller stimulus set sizes were used. Further analyses revealed that these effects were primarily caused by an increase in incorrect "same" responses on nonmatch trials. In Experiment 2, we held the stimulus set size constant at four for each session and alternately set the ITI at 5, 10, or 20 s. Overall accuracy improved when the ITI was increased from 5 to 10 s, but it was the same across the 10- and 20-s conditions. As in Experiment 1, the overall decrease in accuracy during the 5-s condition was caused by a greater number of false "match" responses on nonmatch trials. Taken together, Experiments 1 and 2 showed that auditory short-term memory in monkeys is highly susceptible to proactive interference caused by stimulus repetition. Additional analyses of the data from Experiment 1 suggested that monkeys may make same-different judgments on the basis of a familiarity criterion that is adjusted by error-related feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 332
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Baddeley AD., 1990, Human memory: theory and practice, P169
[2]   Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (12) :2003-2012
[3]   SHORT-TERM-MEMORY FOR HAPTIC CUES IN MONKEYS (MACACA-MULATTA) [J].
BAUER, RH ;
STEELE, TL .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 13 (03) :291-302
[4]   Auditory Memory in Monkeys: Costs and Benefits of Proactive Interference [J].
Bigelow, James ;
Poremba, Amy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2013, 75 (05) :425-434
[5]   Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE [J].
Buffalo, EA ;
Ramus, SJ ;
Clark, RE ;
Teng, E ;
Squire, LR ;
Zola, SM .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 1999, 6 (06) :572-599
[6]   PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE AND DIRECTED FORGETTING IN SHORT-TERM MOTOR MEMORY [J].
BURWITZ, L .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 102 (05) :799-805
[7]   DECAY OF INTERFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF INTERTRIAL INTERVAL IN SHORT-TERM MEMORY [J].
CERMAK, LS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 84 (03) :499-&
[8]   EFFECTS OF VARYING TRIAL DISTRIBUTION, INTRAMAZE AND EXTRAMAZE CUES, AND AMOUNT OF REWARD ON PROACTIVE-INTERFERENCE IN THE RADIAL MAZE [J].
COHEN, JS ;
REID, S ;
CHEW, K .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 22 (02) :134-142
[9]  
Cohen Yale E, 2005, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V4, P218, DOI 10.1177/1534582305285861
[10]  
COLOMBO M, 1986, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V38, P425