Differential effects of Ecstasy and cannabis on self-reports of memory ability: a web-based study

被引:71
作者
Rodgers, J [1 ]
Buchanan, T
Scholey, AB
Heffernan, TM
Ling, J
Parrott, A
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Westminster, Dept Psychol, London W1R 8AL, England
[3] Northumbria Univ, Human Cognit Neurosci Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Teesside, Psychol Sect, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[5] Univ E London, Dept Psychol, London E15 4LZ, England
关键词
Ecstasy; cannabis; everyday memory; prospective memory; Internet; web;
D O I
10.1002/hup.345
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Given the legal status of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), or Ecstasy, face-to-face access to participants is sometimes difficult, The number of participants in studies of cognitive performance amongst Ecstasy users is variable, with the average being around 30. Access to a larger number of participants is clearly desirable. The present investigation accessed a larger sample size using a web-based design. A website was developed and used for data collection. Prospective memory ability was assessed using the Prospective Memory Questionnaire. Self-report of day-to-day memory performance was investigated using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire. The Drug Questionnaire assessed the use of other substances as well as Ecstasy, allowing a regression design to isolate the contribution of each substance to any variance on the cognitive measures. Preliminary findings (N= 488) indicate that there is a clear double dissociation between the impact of Ecstasy and cannabis. We found that cannabis was associated with reports of 'here-and-now' cognitive problems in short-term and internally cued prospective memory. In contrast, Ecstasy was associated with reports of long-term memory problems, which were more related to storage and retrieval difficulties. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 625
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIMENSIONS INTERNET
[2]   THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE (CFQ) AND ITS CORRELATES [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
COOPER, PF ;
FITZGERALD, P ;
PARKES, KR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 21 (FEB) :1-16
[3]   Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web [J].
Buchanan, T ;
Smith, JL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 90 :125-144
[4]   Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness [J].
Buchanan, T .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2000, 32 (04) :521-527
[5]  
Buchanan T., 2000, PSYCHOL EXPT INTERNE, P121, DOI [10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50006-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50006-X]
[6]   Experimental tests of prospective remembering: The influence of cue-event frequency on performance [J].
Ellis, J ;
Kvavilashvili, L ;
Milne, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 90 :9-23
[7]   Effects of brain injury and age on prospective memory self-rating and performance [J].
Hannon, R ;
Adams, P ;
Harrington, S ;
FriesDias, C ;
Gipson, MT .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 40 (04) :289-298
[8]   Subjective ratings of prospective memory deficits in MDMA ('ecstasy') users [J].
Heffernan, TM ;
Ling, J ;
Scholey, AB .
HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2001, 16 (04) :339-344
[9]   CANNABINOID RECEPTOR LOCALIZATION IN BRAIN [J].
HERKENHAM, M ;
LYNN, AB ;
LITTLE, MD ;
JOHNSON, MR ;
MELVIN, LS ;
DECOSTA, BR ;
RICE, KC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (05) :1932-1936
[10]  
Krantz J.H., 2000, PSYCHOL EXPT INTERNE, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50003-4