α-dihydroergocryptine in the prophylaxis of migraine:: A multicenter double-blind study versus flunarizine

被引:23
作者
Bussone, G [7 ]
Cerbo, R
Martucci, N
Micieli, G
Zanferrari, C
Grazzi, L
Fabbrini, G
Cavallini, A
Granella, F
Ambrosoli, L
Mailland, F
Poli, A
Manzoni, G
机构
[1] Ist Neurochirurg C Besta, Headache Ctr, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Neurol Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] Italian Neurotraumatol Inst, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Pavia, C Mondino Inst, Dept Neurol, Headache Ctr, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[5] Univ Parma, Neurol Inst, Headache Ctr, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[6] Poli Ind Chim SpA, Dept Res & Dev, Milan, Italy
[7] Poli Ind Chim SpA, Dept Sci, Milan, Italy
[8] Poli Ind Chim SpA, Stat & Biometr Unit, Milan, Italy
来源
HEADACHE | 1999年 / 39卷 / 06期
关键词
alpha-dihydroergocryptine; flunarizine; migraine prophylaxis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3906426.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This multicenter, double-blind, clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine without aura. One hundred thirty-five patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of the international Headache Society were enrolled at five neurologic centers. The study design included a 1-month pretreatment phase with placebo; a 6-month, double-blind, double-dummy treatment phase with alpha-dihydroergocryptine (10 mg twice daily) or flunarizine (5 mg once daily); a further 3-month followup phase without treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the patient's diary. Laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events were monitored. Analysis of covariance for repeated measures was performed on the intent-to-treat sample. Both treatments led to a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine, days with headache, and use of relief medication. Overall, 51% of those treated with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 49% of those treated with flunarizine were responders (50% or greater reduction in attack frequency), the average percentage of reduction being 64% with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 51% with flunarizine. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of adverse events; dizziness and weight gain were the most frequent observed adverse events with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine, respectively, Based on the overall improvement in migraine parameters, alpha-dihydroergocryptine can be recommended for use in migraine prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 431
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
AMERY WK, 1981, DRUG EXP CLIN RES, V7, P1
[2]
[Anonymous], 1991, Cephalalgia, V11, P1
[3]
BES A, 1986, INT J CLIN PHARM RES, V6, P189
[4]
APOMORPHINE-INDUCED YAWNING IN MIGRAINE PATIENTS - ENHANCED RESPONSIVENESS [J].
BLIN, O ;
AZULAY, JP ;
MASSON, G ;
AUBRESPY, G ;
SERRATRICE, G .
CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 14 (01) :91-95
[5]
CANONICO PL, 1989, CEPHALALGIA S10, V9, P446
[6]
FLUNARIZINE IN MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS - EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF 5 MG AND 10 MG DOSE LEVELS [J].
CENTONZE, V ;
MAGRONE, D ;
VINO, M ;
CAPORALETTI, P ;
ATTOLINI, E ;
CAMPANALE, G ;
ALBANO, O .
CEPHALALGIA, 1990, 10 (01) :17-24
[7]
CLASSIFICATION OF DRUGS ACCORDING TO RECEPTOR-BINDING PROFILES [J].
CLOSSE, A ;
FRICK, W ;
DRAVID, A ;
BOLLIGER, G ;
HAUSER, D ;
SAUTER, A ;
TOBLER, HJ .
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 327 (02) :95-101
[8]
DELBENE E, 1994, HEADACHE, V34, P536
[9]
HYPERRESPONSIVENESS OF MIGRAINE PATIENTS TO THE HYPOTENSIVE ACTION OF BROMOCRIPTINE [J].
FANCIULLACCI, M ;
MICHELACCI, S ;
CURRADI, C ;
SICUTERI, F .
HEADACHE, 1980, 20 (02) :99-102
[10]
DIHYDROERGOKRYPTINE VERSUS DIHYDROERGOTAMINE IN MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
FREDIANI, F ;
GRAZZI, L ;
ZANOTTI, A ;
MAILLAND, F ;
ZAPPACOSTA, BM ;
BUSSONE, G .
CEPHALALGIA, 1991, 11 (03) :117-121