CA 72-4 compared with CEA and CA 19-9 as a marker of some gastrointestinal malignancies

被引:68
作者
Lopez, JB [1 ]
Royan, GP
Lakhwani, MN
Mahadaven, M
Timor, J
机构
[1] Inst Med Res, Div Endocrinol, Kuala Lumpur 50588, Malaysia
[2] Gastroenterol Ctr, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Kuala Lumpur Hosp, Dept Surg, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
gastrointestinal malignancies; CA; 72-4; CEA; 19-9;
D O I
10.1177/172460089901400309
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare CA 72-4 with CEA and CA 19-9 in gastrointestinal malignancies. CA 72-4 was assayed by radioimmunoassay and CEA and CA 19-9 with the Abbott IMx analyser. The study included 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and 20 controls with benign gastrointestinal diseases. The 52 casts showed marker sensitivities of 39%, 49% and 35% for CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9, respectively, and 64% when the markers were combined. Marker expression in serum was highest in colorectal carcinoma followed by gastric and esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivities of the individual markers in colorectal, gastric and esophageal carcinomas, respectively, were: CA 72-4, 56%, 32% and 18%; CEA, 83%, 33% and 18%; CA 19-9, 53%, 25% and 18%. The sensitivity of the three markers in combination was 89%, 50% and 46% in colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer; respectively. The specificity of CA72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 was 100%, 72% mid 86%, respectively. However CA 72-4 is not a useful a marker for gastrointestinal cancers because of its poor sensitivity. CEA, which had the best overall sensitivity and a reasonable specificity, was the most useful single marker, especially for colorectal cancer. Whereas the single markers were not useful in gastric and esophageal cancer; the combination of the three may be.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 177
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*ABB DIAGN, MEIA KIT INS CEA CA1
[2]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF CA 19-9 ASSAY AS A MARKER FOR GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS [J].
ANDRIULLI, A ;
GINDRO, T ;
PIANTINO, P ;
FARINI, R ;
CAVALLINI, G ;
PIAZZI, L ;
NACCARATO, R ;
DOBRILLA, G ;
VERME, G ;
SCURO, LA .
DIGESTION, 1986, 33 (01) :26-33
[3]   IMMUNOASSAYS FOR CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN - SPECIFICITY AND INTERFERENCES [J].
BORMER, OP .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1993, 53 (01) :1-9
[4]   CA72-4 - A NEW TUMOR-MARKER FOR GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
BYRNE, DJ ;
BROWNING, MCK ;
CUSCHIERI, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (09) :1010-1013
[5]  
DELVILLANO BC, 1983, CLIN CHEM, V29, P549
[6]   NEW CANCER MARKERS [J].
DUFFY, MJ .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 26 :379-387
[7]   HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC VIRAL-HEPATITIS - ETIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT [J].
DUSHEIKO, GM .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 46 (02) :492-511
[8]   CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN [J].
FLETCHER, RH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (01) :66-73
[9]  
Galen RS, 1975, NORMALITY PREDICTIVE
[10]   CA-72-4 RADIOIMMUNOASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF THE TAG-72 CARCINOMA-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN IN SERUM OF PATIENTS [J].
GERO, EJ ;
COLCHER, D ;
FERRONI, P ;
MELSHEIMER, R ;
GIANI, S ;
SCHLOM, J ;
KAPLAN, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 1989, 3 (06) :360-369