Effect of candesartan on prevention (DIRECT-Prevent 1) and progression (DIRECT-Protect 1) of retinopathy in type 1 diabetes: randomised, placebo-controlled trials

被引:341
作者
Chaturvedi, Nish [1 ]
Porta, Massimo [2 ]
Klein, Ronald [3 ]
Orchard, Trevor [4 ]
Fuller, John [5 ]
Parving, Hans Henrik [6 ]
Bilous, Rudy [7 ]
Sjolie, Anne Katrin [8 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Int Ctr Circulatory Hlth, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London W2 1PG, England
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Internal Med, Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[6] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Dept Med Endocrinol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] S Cleveland Hosp, Audrey Collins Teaching Unit, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[8] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61412-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Results of previous studies suggest that renin-angiotensin system blockers might reduce the burden of diabetic retinopathy. We therefore designed the DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT) Programme to assess whether candesartan could reduce the incidence and progression of retinopathy in type 1 diabetes. Methods Two randomised, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled trials were done in 309 centres worldwide. Participants with normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetes without retinopathy were recruited to the DIRECT-Prevent I trial and those with existing retinopathy were recruited to DIRECT-Protect 1, and were assigned to candesartan 16 mg once a day or matching placebo. After I month, the dose was doubled to 32 mg. Investigators and participants were unaware of the treatment allocation status. The primary endpoints were incidence and progression of retinopathy and were defined as at least a two-step and at least a three-step increase on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, respectively. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00252733 for DIRECT-Prevent 1 and NCT00252720 for DIRECT-Protect 1. Findings 1421 participants (aged 18-50 years) were randomly assigned to candesartan (n=711) or to placebo (n=710) in DIRECT-Prevent 1, and 1905 (aged 18-55 years) to candesartan (n=951) or to placebo (n=954) in DIRECT-Protect 1. Incidence of retinopathy was seen in 178 (25%) participants in the candesartan group versus 217 (31%) in the placebo group. Progression of retinopathy occurred in 127 (13%) participants in the candesartan group versus 124 (13%) in the placebo group. Hazard ratio (HR for candesartan vs placebo) was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67-1.00, p=0.0508) for incidence of retinopathy and 1.02 (0.80-1.31, p=0.85) for progression of retinopathy. The post-hoc outcome of at least a three-step increase for incidence yielded an HR of 0.65 (0.48-0.87, p=0.0034), which was attenuated but still significant after adjustment for baseline characteristics (0.71, 0.53-0.95, p=0.046). Final ETDRS level was more likely to have improved with candesartan treatment in both DIRECT-Prevent 1 (odds 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.30, p=0.0048) and DIRECT-Protect 1 (1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25, p=0.0264). Adverse events did not differ between the treatment groups. Interpretation Although candesartan reduces the incidence of retinopathy, we did not see a beneficial effect on retinopathy progression.
引用
收藏
页码:1394 / 1402
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ALDINGTON SJ, 1995, DIABETOLOGIA, V38, P437, DOI 10.1007/BF00410281
[2]   A proportional hazards model for arbitrarily censored and truncated data [J].
Alioum, A ;
Commenges, D .
BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (02) :512-524
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Ophthalmology, V98, P823
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Ophthalmology, V98, P786
[5]  
Belcher G, 1997, J HUM HYPERTENS, V11, pS85
[6]  
Bursell SE, 1996, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V37, P886
[7]   Should all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A meta-analysis of individual patient data [J].
Chaturvedi, N .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (05) :370-379
[8]   Effect of lisinopril on progression of retinopathy in normotensive people with type 1 diabetes [J].
Chaturvedi, N ;
Sjolie, AK ;
Stephenson, JM ;
Abrahamian, H ;
Keipes, M ;
Castellarin, A ;
Rogulja-Pepeonik, Z ;
Fuller, JH .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9095) :28-31
[9]   Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol [J].
Dahlöf, B ;
Devereux, RB ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Julius, S ;
Beevers, G ;
de Faire, U ;
Fyhrquist, F ;
Ibsen, H ;
Kristiansson, K ;
Lederballe-Pedersen, O ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Omvik, P ;
Oparil, S ;
Wedel, H .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) :995-1003
[10]   Methodological development:: Structured outcome assessment and community risk monitoring (SORM) [J].
Grann, M ;
Sturidsson, K ;
Haggård-Grann, U ;
Hiscoke, UL ;
Alm, PO ;
Dernevik, M ;
Gumpert, C ;
Hallqvist, J ;
Hallquist, T ;
Kullgren, G ;
Långström, N ;
Lotterberg, M ;
Nordström, K ;
Ståhle, L ;
Woodhouse, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 28 (04) :442-456