Effects of Tennessee medicaid managed care on obstetrical care and birth outcomes

被引:28
作者
Conover, CJ
Rankin, PJ
Sloan, FA
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy Law & Management, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Charles River Associates Inc, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1215/03616878-26-6-1291
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A comparative study was conducted in two neighboring states, Tennessee and North Carolina, to determine whether Medicaid managed care (implemented in Tennessee as TennCare) affected prenatal care, care patterns at labor-delivery, and birth outcomes. A pre- and post-design coupled with a difference-indifference approach-using North Carolina as a control-was used to assess TennCare's effects for all births and for three categories of high-risk mothers (under acre eighteen, unwed, or living in high poverty areas). Data from 328,296 singleton births in birth files and matched birth-death files for 1993 and 1995 in both states were used to analyze a number of variables related to maternal behavior during pregnancy, utilization of care before and after labor-delivery, patterns of obstetrical care at delivery, and birth outcomes. Under TennCare, Tennessee mothers were relatively more likely to obtain no prenatal care or to wait and initiate third trimester care as compared to those in North Carolina. Relative utilization of specific prenatal procedures declined, Apgar scores fell very slightly, and birth abnormalities increased in the poverty subsample. TennCare had no significant effect on infant mortality. Utilization reductions in obstetrical services were achieved with apparent spillovers to non-TennCare births, but without adverse effects overall. TennCare was neither a panacea nor an unmitigated disaster. It is a model worth examining, but not uncritically.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1324
页数:34
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
*AARP, 1995, REF HLTH CAR SYST ST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 33 URB I
[4]  
[Anonymous], MANAGED CARE LOW INC
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB HLTH EC
[6]  
BAKER L, 1997, NBER WORKING PAPER, V6187
[7]   The effect of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: Evidence from Medicare [J].
Baker, LC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (04) :453-481
[8]   HMO market penetration and costs of employer-sponsored health plans [J].
Baker, LC ;
Cantor, JC ;
Long, SH ;
Marquis, MS .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2000, 19 (05) :121-128
[9]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRUCTURAL AND HEALTH-SERVICES VARIABLES AND STATE-LEVEL INFANT-MORTALITY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BIRD, ST ;
BAUMAN, KE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (01) :26-29
[10]  
Blumstein JF, 2000, VANDERBILT LAW REV, V53, P125