Corticospinal direct response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans

被引:38
作者
Fujiki, M [1 ]
Isono, M [1 ]
Hori, S [1 ]
Ueno, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TOKYO,DEPT MED ELECT,TOKYO,JAPAN
来源
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1996年 / 101卷 / 01期
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor cortex; electrical stimulation; motor evoked potential; corticospinal D response;
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(95)00122-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The corticospinal motor evoked potential (MEP) response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was investigated in comparison with the direct (D) response to electrical stimulation of the exposed motor cortex from the spinal epidural space in 7 neurologically normal patients during brain tumor surgery. The D response during operation was obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the scalp over the areas of the cerebral motor cortex, the hand or arm areas. The magnetic induced D response showed a conduction velocity of 50.5-72.7 m/sec and was resistant to anesthesia and unaffected by muscle relaxants and tolerant to high frequency (500 Hz) paired magnetic stimulus, and the latencies of magnetic MEPs corresponded to those with direct electrical stimulation. Thus, recordings of the D response by transcranial magnetic stimulation are useful for not only identifying the location of the motor cortex during intracranial surgery but also for non-invasive recording of pyramidal tract activity during extracranial surgery under general anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 57
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF CORTICOSPINAL ACTIVATION BY MAGNETIC COIL AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF MONKEY MOTOR CORTEX
    AMASSIAN, VE
    QUIRK, GJ
    STEWART, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 77 (05): : 390 - 401
  • [2] FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    AMASSIAN, VE
    CRACCO, RQ
    MACCABEE, PJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06): : 401 - 416
  • [3] MODELING MAGNETIC COIL EXCITATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH A PERIPHERAL-NERVE IMMERSED IN A BRAIN-SHAPED VOLUME CONDUCTOR - THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FIBER BENDING IN EXCITATION
    AMASSIAN, VE
    EBERLE, L
    MACCABEE, PJ
    CRACCO, RQ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (05): : 291 - 301
  • [4] BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
  • [5] DESCENDING VOLLEY AFTER ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION IN MAN
    BERARDELLI, A
    INGHILLERI, M
    CRUCCU, G
    MANFREDI, M
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1990, 112 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [6] OPTIMAL FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC ACTIVATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - EFFECTS OF COIL ORIENTATION, SHAPE OF THE INDUCED CURRENT PULSE, AND STIMULUS-INTENSITY
    BRASILNETO, JP
    COHEN, LG
    PANIZZA, M
    NILSSON, J
    ROTH, BJ
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 9 (01) : 132 - 136
  • [7] CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS EVOKED BY ANODAL AND CATHODAL STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
    BURKE, D
    HICKS, RG
    STEPHEN, JPH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1990, 425 : 283 - 299
  • [8] DIRECT COMPARISON OF CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS TO TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    BURKE, D
    HICKS, R
    GANDEVIA, SC
    STEPHEN, J
    WOODFORTH, I
    CRAWFORD, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 470 : 383 - 393
  • [9] EFFECTS OF COIL DESIGN ON DELIVERY OF FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    COHEN, LG
    ROTH, BJ
    NILSSON, J
    DANG, N
    PANIZZA, M
    BANDINELLI, S
    FRIAUF, W
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04): : 350 - 357
  • [10] MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX, AN INDICATOR OF REORGANIZATION IN MOTOR PATHWAYS IN CERTAIN PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
    COHEN, LG
    ROTH, BJ
    WASSERMANN, EM
    TOPKA, H
    FUHR, P
    SCHULTZ, J
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) : 56 - 65