Optimal Function Explains Forest Responses to Global Change

被引:80
作者
Dewar, Roderick C. [1 ]
Franklin, Oskar [2 ]
Makela, Annikki [3 ]
McMurtrie, Ross E. [4 ]
Valentine, Harry T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol Sci, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Ecol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] US Forest Serv, Durham, NH USA
基金
芬兰科学院; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
adaptation; global change; modeling; optimization; resource availability; ELEVATED ATMOSPHERIC CO2; NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY; LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY; CARBON GAIN; LEAF-AREA; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; PLANT-GROWTH; ALLOCATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ENRICHMENT;
D O I
10.1525/bio.2009.59.2.6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Plant responses to global changes in carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen, and water availability are critical to future atmospheric CO2 concentrations, hydrology; and hence climate. Our understanding of those responses is incomplete, however. Multiple-resource manipulation experiments and empirical observations have revealed a diversity of responses, as well as some consistent patterns. But vegetation models-currently dominated by complex numerical simulation models-have yet to achieve a consensus among their predicted responses, let alone offer a coherent explanation of the observed ones. Here the propose an alternative approach based on relatively simple optimization models (OMs). We highlight the results of three recent forest OMs, which together explain a remarkable range of observed forest responses to altered resource availability. We conclude that OMs now offer a simple yet powerful approach to predicting the responses of forests-and, potentially; other plant types-to global change. We recommend ways in which OMs could be developed further in this direction.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 139
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Self-shading, carbon gain and leaf dynamics: a test of alternative optimality models [J].
Ackerly, D .
OECOLOGIA, 1999, 119 (03) :300-310
[2]   What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)?: A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy [J].
Ainsworth, EA ;
Long, SP .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2005, 165 (02) :351-371
[3]   The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]:: mechanisms and environmental interactions [J].
Ainsworth, Elizabeth A. ;
Rogers, Alistair .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 30 (03) :258-270
[4]  
[Anonymous], 4 ASS REP CLIM CHANG
[5]   Optimal photosynthetic characteristics of individual plants in vegetation stands and implications for species coexistence [J].
Anten, NPR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2005, 95 (03) :495-506
[6]   Atmospheric CO2 elevation has little effect on nitrifying and denitrifying enzyme activity in four European grasslands [J].
Barnard, R ;
Barthes, L ;
Le Roux, X ;
Harmens, H ;
Raschi, A ;
Soussana, JF ;
Winkler, B ;
Leadley, PW .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (04) :488-497
[7]   LONG-TERM RESPONSE OF NUTRIENT-LIMITED FORESTS TO CO2 ENRICHMENT - EQUILIBRIUM BEHAVIOR OF PLANT-SOIL MODELS [J].
COMINS, HN ;
MCMURTRIE, RE .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1993, 3 (04) :666-681
[8]  
Cowan I R, 1977, Symp Soc Exp Biol, V31, P471
[9]   Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change:: results from six dynamic global vegetation models [J].
Cramer, W ;
Bondeau, A ;
Woodward, FI ;
Prentice, IC ;
Betts, RA ;
Brovkin, V ;
Cox, PM ;
Fisher, V ;
Foley, JA ;
Friend, AD ;
Kucharik, C ;
Lomas, MR ;
Ramankutty, N ;
Sitch, S ;
Smith, B ;
White, A ;
Young-Molling, C .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2001, 7 (04) :357-373
[10]  
Dewar RC, 2005, UND COM SYS, P41