Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects

被引:311
作者
Firpo, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Dept Econ, BR-22453 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
quantile treatment effects; propensity score; semiparametric efficiency bounds; efficient estimation; semiparametric estimation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00738.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops estimators for quantile treatment effects under the identifying restriction that selection to treatment is based on observable characteristics. Identification is achieved without requiring cornputation of the conditional quantiles of the potential outcomes. Instead, the identification results for the marginal quantiles lead to an estimation procedure for the quantile treatment effect parameters that has two steps: nonparametric estimation of the propensity score and computation of the difference between the solutions of two separate minimization problems. Root-N consistency, asymptotic normality, and achievement of the semiparametric efficiency bound are shown for that estimator. A consistent estimation procedure for the variance is also presented. Finally, the method developed here is applied to evaluation of a job training program and to a Monte Carlo exercise. Results from the empirical application indicate that the method works relatively well even for a data set with limited overlap between treated and controls in the support of covariates. The Monte Carlo study shows that, for a relatively small sample size, the method produces estimates with good precision and low bias, especially for middle quantiles.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 276
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models [J].
Abadie, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :284-292
[2]   Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings [J].
Abadie, A ;
Angrist, J ;
Imbens, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :91-117
[3]   2 STAGE LEAST ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS ESTIMATORS [J].
AMEMIYA, T .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (03) :689-711
[4]   Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models [J].
Athey, S ;
Imbens, GW .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (02) :431-497
[5]  
Barnow B. S., 1980, EVALUATION STUDIES R, V5, P43
[6]  
Bickel Peter J, 1993, Efficient and adaptive estimation for semiparametric models, V4
[7]   What mean impacts miss: Distributional effects of welfare reform experiments [J].
Bitler, Marianne P. ;
Gelbach, Jonah B. ;
Hoynes, Hilary W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (04) :988-1012
[8]   The effect of unions on the structure of wages: A longitudinal analysis [J].
Card, D .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (04) :957-979
[9]   An IV model of quantile treatment effects [J].
Chernozhukov, V ;
Hansen, C .
ECONOMETRICA, 2005, 73 (01) :245-261
[10]   Causal effects in, nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (448) :1053-1062