Substitutions for hydrophobic amino acids in the N-terminal domains of IGFBP-3 and-5 markedly reduce IGF-I binding and alter their biologic actions

被引:99
作者
Imai, Y [1 ]
Moralez, A [1 ]
Andag, U [1 ]
Clarke, JB [1 ]
Busby, WH [1 ]
Clemmons, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Endocrinol, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M000070200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 and -5 (IGFBP-3 and -5) have been shown to bind insulin-like growth factor-I and -II (IGF-I and -II) with high affinity. Precious studies have proposed that the N-terminal region of IGFBP-5 contains a hydrophobic patch between residues 49 and 74 that is required for high affinity binding. These studies were undertaken to determine if mutagenesis of several of these residues resulted in a reduction of the affinity of IGFBP-3 and -5 for IGF-I. Substitutions for residues 68, 69, 70, 73, and 74 in IGFBP-5 (changing one charged residue, Lys(68), to a neutral one and the four hydrophobic residues to nonhydrophobic residues) resulted in an similar to 1000-fold reduction in the affinity of IGFBP-5 for IGF-I. Substitutions for homologous residues in IGFBP-3 also resulted in a >1000-fold reduction in affinity, The physiologic consequence of this reduction was that IGFBP-5 and -5 became very weak inhibitors of IGF-I-stimulated cell migration and DNA synthesis. Likewise, the ability of IGFBP-5 to inhibit IGF-I-stimulated receptor phosphorylation was attenuated. These changes did not appear to be because of alterations in protein folding induced by mutagenesis, because the IGFBP-5 mutant was fully susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by a specific IGFBP-5 protease, In summary, residues 68, 69, 70, 73, and 74 in IGFBP-5 appear to be critical for high affinity binding to IGF-I. Homologous residues in IGFBP-3 are also required, suggesting that they form a similar binding pocket and that for both proteins these residues form an important component of the core binding site. The availability of these mutants will make it possible to determine if there are direct, non-IGF-I-dependent effects of IGFBP-3 and -5 on cellular physiologic processes in cell types that secrete IGF-I.
引用
收藏
页码:18188 / 18194
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   CARBOXY-TRUNCATED INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR BINDING PROTEIN-5 STIMULATES MITOGENESIS IN OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS [J].
ANDRESS, DL ;
LOOP, SM ;
ZAPF, J ;
KIEFER, MC .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1993, 195 (01) :25-30
[2]   Substitution of specific amino acids in insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein 5 alters heparin binding and its change in affinity for IGF-I in response to heparin [J].
Arai, T ;
Clarke, J ;
Parker, A ;
Busby, W ;
Nam, T ;
Clemmons, DR .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (11) :6099-6106
[3]  
BACH LA, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P9246
[4]   Amino acids within the extracellular matrix (ECM) binding region (201-218) of rat insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-5 are important determinants in binding IGF-I [J].
Bramani, S ;
Song, H ;
Beattie, J ;
Tonner, E ;
Flint, DJ ;
Allan, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 23 (01) :117-123
[5]  
CAMACHOHUBNER C, 1992, J BIOL CHEM, V267, P11949
[6]   PROTEOLYTIC CLEAVAGE OF INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR BINDING-PROTEIN-4 (IGFBP-4) - LOCALIZATION OF CLEAVAGE SITE TO NONHOMOLOGOUS REGION OF NATIVE IGFBP-4 [J].
CHERNAUSEK, SD ;
SMITH, CE ;
DUFFIN, KL ;
BUSBY, WH ;
WRIGHT, G ;
CLEMMONS, DR .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 270 (19) :11377-11382
[7]  
Clemmons David R., 1997, Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, V8, P45, DOI 10.1016/S1359-6101(96)00053-6
[8]   COMPETITION FOR BINDING TO INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR (IGF) BINDING PROTEIN-2, 3, 4, AND 5 BY THE IGFS AND IGF ANALOGS [J].
CLEMMONS, DR ;
DEHOFF, ML ;
BUSBY, WH ;
BAYNE, ML ;
CASCIERI, MA .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1992, 131 (02) :890-895
[9]   IGF BINDING-PROTEINS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS [J].
CLEMMONS, DR .
MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 35 (04) :368-375
[10]  
Conover Cheryl A., 1995, Progress in Growth Factor Research, V6, P301, DOI 10.1016/0955-2235(95)00032-1