Perioperative Mortality for Management of Hepatic Neoplasm A Simple Risk Score

被引:39
作者
Simons, Jessica P. [1 ]
Hill, Joshua S. [1 ]
Ng, Sing Chau [1 ]
Shah, Shimul A. [1 ]
Zhou, Zheng [1 ]
Whalen, Giles F. [1 ]
Tseng, Jennifer F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Surg,UMass Surg Outcomes Anal & Res, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA METASTASES; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; LIVER METASTASES; OPERATIVE MORTALITY; SURGICAL RESECTION; UNITED-STATES; SYSTEM; CANCER; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9c2f
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To develop a population-based risk score for stratifying patients by risk of in-hospital mortality following procedural intervention for hepatic neoplasm. Background: There has been growing support for the value of surgical management of hepatic neoplastic disease, both primary and metastatic. Advances in surgical and ablative technologies have contributed to a decrease in the mortality associated with these procedures. However, multiple patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors can contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2005, a retrospective cohort of patient-discharges for hepatic procedures with a concurrent diagnosis of hepatic primary or metastatic neoplasm to the liver was assembled. Procedures were categorized as lobectomy, wedge resection, or enucleation/ablation. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were use to create an integer score for estimating the risk of in-hospital mortality using patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, tumor type, and hospital characteristics. A randomly selected sample of 80% of the cohort was used to create the risk score. Testing was conducted in the remaining 20% validation-set. Results: In total, 12,969 patient-discharges were identified. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.45%. Predictive characteristics incorporated into the model included: age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, procedure type, hospital type, and type of neoplasm. Integer values were assigned to these, and used to calculate an additive score. Five clinically relevant groups were assembled to stratify risk, with a 36-fold gradient in mortality. Rates in the groups were as follows: 0.9%, 2.5%, 6.8%, 17.6%, and 35.9%. In the derivation set, as well as in the validation set, the simple score discriminated well, with c-statistics of 0.76 and 0.70, respectively. Conclusions: An integer-based risk score can be used to predict in-hospital mortality after hepatic procedure for neoplasm, and may be useful for preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 934
页数:6
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Solitary colorectal liver metastasis - Resection determines outcome
    Aloia, TA
    Vauthey, JN
    Loyer, EM
    Ribero, D
    Pawlik, TM
    Wei, SH
    Curley, SA
    Zorzi, D
    Abdalla, EK
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2006, 141 (05) : 460 - 466
  • [2] Does the literature support an indication for hepatic metastasectomy other than for colorectal primary?
    Alseidi, A
    Helton, WS
    Espat, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, INT CLASSIFICATION D
  • [4] The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI - A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making
    Antman, EM
    Cohen, M
    Bernink, PJLM
    McCabe, CH
    Horacek, T
    Papuchis, G
    Mautner, B
    Corbalan, R
    Radley, D
    Braunwald, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (07): : 835 - 842
  • [5] APGAR V, 1953, Curr Res Anesth Analg, V32, P260
  • [6] Operative mortality after hepatic resection: Are literature-based rates broadly applicable?
    Asiyanbola, Bolanle
    Chang, David
    Gleisner, Ana Luiza
    Nathan, Hari
    Choti, Michael A.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (05) : 842 - 851
  • [7] Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: An update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection
    Belghiti, J
    Hiramatsu, K
    Benoist, S
    Massault, PP
    Sauvanet, A
    Farges, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 191 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [8] Berney T, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1423
  • [9] Hepatic resection: Effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors
    Buell, JF
    Rosen, S
    Yoshida, A
    Labow, D
    Limsrichamrern, S
    Cronin, DC
    Bruce, DS
    Wen, M
    Michelassi, F
    Millis, JM
    Posner, MC
    [J]. SURGERY, 2000, 128 (04) : 686 - 692
  • [10] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383