Patterns of multi-agent land conservation: Crowding in/out, agglomeration, and policy

被引:47
作者
Albers, Heidi J. [1 ]
Ando, Amy W. [2 ]
Batz, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Resources, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Emerging Pathogens Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Land conservation; Biodiversity; Private; Spatial; Game; Land trust;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.04.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Private agents make large contributions to networks of conserved land, but little is known about how private agents' decisions might be altered by government actions. This paper explores the impact of public conservation and public policy on the quantity and configuration of private land conservation and the extent to which the social optimum is reached. Because land conservation benefits often have thresholds and spatial characteristics, we consider the impact of different land conservation benefit functions on the patterns of conservation created by the interaction of private and public agents. We find that public conservation crowds private conservation in or out depending on whether marginal conservation benefits increase or decrease with total acreage, and crowding out is mitigated by the presence of budget constraints. We show how land conservation agents might interact strategically in space depending on preferences over fragmentation, and we explore that spatial strategic interaction in a case with a regional land trust and a case with hot-spot parcels. We identify when government policies, such as agglomeration bonuses and mitigating coordination costs, are most likely to increase the social benefits provided by private land conservation agents. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 508
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Modeling ecological constraints on tropical forest management: Spatial interdependence, irreversibility, and uncertainty [J].
Albers, HJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :73-94
[2]   Could state-level variation in the number of land trusts make economic sense? [J].
Albers, HJ ;
Ando, AW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (03) :311-327
[3]  
ALBERS HJ, 2006, EQUILIBRIUM PATTERNS
[4]  
ALBERS HJ, J ENV EC MA IN PRESS
[5]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[6]   Toward a theory of charitable fund-raising [J].
Andreoni, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) :1186-1213
[7]  
COOPER RW, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P218
[8]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[9]   CHEAP TALK, COORDINATION, AND ENTRY [J].
FARRELL, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 18 (01) :34-39